Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Theories/Opinions on WotC's Plan
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="buzz" data-source="post: 3476117" data-attributes="member: 6777"><p>I think it comes down to this, but I don't think it's anything as Machiavellian as "wanting control" as it is simply identifying a number of profitable licenses that are benefiting the licensor more than they are WotC. There's been a great deal of market shrinkage since the d20 boom, and I can see that it simply makes good business sense to reign in various revenue-generating IP.</p><p></p><p>However, I really don't see any connection between these actions and either 4e or the OGL. Continuing to maintain the SRD is simply a no-brainer, IMO. It's a minimal investment on WotC's part that gains them the continued fostering of a network of players and publishers who all support their core products in one way or another. Release a closed 4e and all you're doing is, e.g., encouraging FFG to port the next edition of <em>Midnight</em> to some other RPG... instead of making it yet another product that helps sell the 4e core books.</p><p></p><p>The SRD is low-hanging fruit. I simply don't think WotC is that stupid. Rather, I think people are trying to paint the grimmest picture possible in light of recent announcements.</p><p></p><p>As for not providing more detail about the DI, I agree with various pundits (including Dancey, iirc) who have said that not doing so has allowed the spotlight to remain on Paizo for the time being. Had the DI been ready to go the day of the announcement, how many more subscribers would have asked for a cash refund instead of Paizo store credit or a <em>Pathfinder</em> sub?</p><p></p><p>It could simply be coincidence, but WotC's silence has been in Paizo's favor regardless.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="buzz, post: 3476117, member: 6777"] I think it comes down to this, but I don't think it's anything as Machiavellian as "wanting control" as it is simply identifying a number of profitable licenses that are benefiting the licensor more than they are WotC. There's been a great deal of market shrinkage since the d20 boom, and I can see that it simply makes good business sense to reign in various revenue-generating IP. However, I really don't see any connection between these actions and either 4e or the OGL. Continuing to maintain the SRD is simply a no-brainer, IMO. It's a minimal investment on WotC's part that gains them the continued fostering of a network of players and publishers who all support their core products in one way or another. Release a closed 4e and all you're doing is, e.g., encouraging FFG to port the next edition of [I]Midnight[/I] to some other RPG... instead of making it yet another product that helps sell the 4e core books. The SRD is low-hanging fruit. I simply don't think WotC is that stupid. Rather, I think people are trying to paint the grimmest picture possible in light of recent announcements. As for not providing more detail about the DI, I agree with various pundits (including Dancey, iirc) who have said that not doing so has allowed the spotlight to remain on Paizo for the time being. Had the DI been ready to go the day of the announcement, how many more subscribers would have asked for a cash refund instead of Paizo store credit or a [I]Pathfinder[/I] sub? It could simply be coincidence, but WotC's silence has been in Paizo's favor regardless. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Theories/Opinions on WotC's Plan
Top