Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
There’s a Baldur’s Gate TV Show Coming!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 9854657" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>They don't though.</p><p></p><p>This has been shown time and time again.</p><p></p><p>Those fans have a good idea of what they, personally and specifically, like and dislike, but not the larger group of people who will go and see a movie or play a game or the like. "Serious fans" have very often predicted something would a hit or a flop based on their personal tastes, and been completely wrong.</p><p></p><p>Your specific examples don't support your position. Let's look at them.</p><p></p><p>Sonic - This was immediately widely mocked. It wasn't "Sonic fans" who said it was wrong, it was literally everyone who had ever seen Sonic before, hell, even some people who hadn't but were repulsed by this creepy thing. <em>Nobody </em>liked the design to the point that there's been some (not entirely baseless) speculation the whole thing was a publicity stunt - because it was so far out from release it was very easy for them to "fix" it, and doesn't seem to have cost the movie a lot to do so.</p><p></p><p>So you didn't need "serious fans" to tell you this. The "serious fans" just agreed with everyone else.</p><p></p><p>4E's marketing - Again, you wouldn't need "serious fans" to tell you "insulting all the previous editions is a bad idea". You just need to not be in an echo-chamber, which apparently WotC's marketing department must have been at the time.</p><p></p><p>"Serious fans" can also get things very wrong by contributing to echo-chambers too. For example, when Blizzard wanted to introduce Real ID which would show your actual, RL email address to basically random people in WoW (potentially including your RL name - most people's did, and at the time it was extremely painful to try and change the email associated with your WoW account, and it kind of still is), they sold this as "Well everyone is called stuff like John Smith, that's not going to be a problem!" because to them, "everyone" was the extremely white, extremely male echo-chamber at Blizzard. And a lot of "hardcore fans" defended this, because they too were mostly extremely white and extremely male</p><p></p><p>A more complex example might be the Classic servers for WoW. Originally WoW's director said, famously "You think you want it but you don't!" re: Classic servers. Blizzard later changed their mind and created those servers, and initially they were a big hit (like 4E, actually), seemingly proving the previous director wrong. But the numbers have declined extremely hard, and Classic servers are now mostly just a weird place full of horrible people and the worst behaviour you'll find in WoW. The earlier director was absolutely right in that they aren't generally popular with WoW's audience as a whole, and the only people who seem to like them are a peculiar species of "hardcore fans" or "serious fans" who are quite unpleasant to be around, quite anti-social (ironic, given Classic requires more social behaviour). But he was wrong in that that specific kind of fan, and basically nobody else, does like them. In a weird way they serve as a kind of useful "self-exclusion zone" by attracting some of the worst of the worst to them, but they also unfortunately drive away returning players who think they'd like to play early WoW again, only to find it's full of incredibly obnoxious people who want to tell you how bad and dumb you are (which, like, I played early WoW, it wasn't even 10% as bad as this).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ruin Explorer, post: 9854657, member: 18"] They don't though. This has been shown time and time again. Those fans have a good idea of what they, personally and specifically, like and dislike, but not the larger group of people who will go and see a movie or play a game or the like. "Serious fans" have very often predicted something would a hit or a flop based on their personal tastes, and been completely wrong. Your specific examples don't support your position. Let's look at them. Sonic - This was immediately widely mocked. It wasn't "Sonic fans" who said it was wrong, it was literally everyone who had ever seen Sonic before, hell, even some people who hadn't but were repulsed by this creepy thing. [I]Nobody [/I]liked the design to the point that there's been some (not entirely baseless) speculation the whole thing was a publicity stunt - because it was so far out from release it was very easy for them to "fix" it, and doesn't seem to have cost the movie a lot to do so. So you didn't need "serious fans" to tell you this. The "serious fans" just agreed with everyone else. 4E's marketing - Again, you wouldn't need "serious fans" to tell you "insulting all the previous editions is a bad idea". You just need to not be in an echo-chamber, which apparently WotC's marketing department must have been at the time. "Serious fans" can also get things very wrong by contributing to echo-chambers too. For example, when Blizzard wanted to introduce Real ID which would show your actual, RL email address to basically random people in WoW (potentially including your RL name - most people's did, and at the time it was extremely painful to try and change the email associated with your WoW account, and it kind of still is), they sold this as "Well everyone is called stuff like John Smith, that's not going to be a problem!" because to them, "everyone" was the extremely white, extremely male echo-chamber at Blizzard. And a lot of "hardcore fans" defended this, because they too were mostly extremely white and extremely male A more complex example might be the Classic servers for WoW. Originally WoW's director said, famously "You think you want it but you don't!" re: Classic servers. Blizzard later changed their mind and created those servers, and initially they were a big hit (like 4E, actually), seemingly proving the previous director wrong. But the numbers have declined extremely hard, and Classic servers are now mostly just a weird place full of horrible people and the worst behaviour you'll find in WoW. The earlier director was absolutely right in that they aren't generally popular with WoW's audience as a whole, and the only people who seem to like them are a peculiar species of "hardcore fans" or "serious fans" who are quite unpleasant to be around, quite anti-social (ironic, given Classic requires more social behaviour). But he was wrong in that that specific kind of fan, and basically nobody else, does like them. In a weird way they serve as a kind of useful "self-exclusion zone" by attracting some of the worst of the worst to them, but they also unfortunately drive away returning players who think they'd like to play early WoW again, only to find it's full of incredibly obnoxious people who want to tell you how bad and dumb you are (which, like, I played early WoW, it wasn't even 10% as bad as this). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
There’s a Baldur’s Gate TV Show Coming!
Top