Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Kid Charlemagne" data-source="post: 2469828" data-attributes="member: 93">Hey, I certainly didn't mean to impy that!&nbsp; It's just when anyone presents a scenario, we're likely to try and solve it, and of course its never an easy thing to do.&nbsp; And when it comes to them not wanting to take the ship - that's a very valid reason.Myself, I tend to go between two paths on this kind of thing.&nbsp; Which path I choose depends on what I'm trying to convey.&nbsp; If I want to convey the challenge of the journey, I'll go ahead and do the overland journey, played out relatively in full.&nbsp; If the journey is not so important, I'll hand-wave it in order to get on to the main thing.As I get older and have more time between sessions, I find that I want the PC's to get to the key areas faster in order to keep things moving.&nbsp; If I were 20, and playing my campaign every week like I did then, I'd play it out longer.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Kid Charlemagne, post: 2469828, member: 93"] Hey, I certainly didn't mean to impy that! It's just when anyone presents a scenario, we're likely to try and solve it, and of course its never an easy thing to do. And when it comes to them not wanting to take the ship - that's a very valid reason. Myself, I tend to go between two paths on this kind of thing. Which path I choose depends on what I'm trying to convey. If I want to convey the challenge of the journey, I'll go ahead and do the overland journey, played out relatively in full. If the journey is not so important, I'll hand-wave it in order to get on to the main thing. As I get older and have more time between sessions, I find that I want the PC's to get to the key areas faster in order to keep things moving. If I were 20, and playing my campaign every week like I did then, I'd play it out longer. [/QUOTE]

Verification