Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Ashrym" data-source="post: 9014268" data-attributes="member: 6750235">This doesn't look like an apples and oranges comparison.&nbsp; It looks like an emotional response full of hyperbole over a change that still works when I try it.&nbsp; The fact that it's not a change with which you agree does not invalidate my experience or opinion.&quot;Some of us understand an apples to oranges comparison when we see it.&quot;That implies I lack understanding because I do not agree with you.&nbsp; Your experience and opinions are also valid but they are not better than mine and I do not appreciate the implication.&nbsp; No one's experience or opinions are less than yours just because they disagree with you.The change from pact magic to that spell progression did not break the class.&nbsp; It made it different than it was and it still works.&nbsp; The higher level spells are still in the mystic arcanum invocation instead and that could come a bit earlier.&nbsp; The damage is still there in EB and there's more utility in the spell progression now so using mystic arcanum to add a spell like fireball at the same level as a wizard or sorcerer is still an option.If you think it's an apples to oranges comparison please explain why.&nbsp; We can discuss that without the micro-aggression.I don't agree with the implementation being half-assed.&nbsp; I do prefer pact magic and plan on putting that in my feedback.&nbsp; It didn't make the class unplayable or radically nerfed, however.Who are &quot;these people&quot;?&nbsp; That's placing anyone who doesn't agree with you into a category of a lesser person.&nbsp; Your opinions do not invalidate anyone else.&nbsp; That's the type of toxic attitude we don't need on this site.Go hydrated.&nbsp; Eat a Snickers.&nbsp; Relax.&nbsp; And then post why you prefer your opinion instead of expressing that type of aggression.&nbsp; It's okay.&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Ashrym, post: 9014268, member: 6750235"] This doesn't look like an apples and oranges comparison. It looks like an emotional response full of hyperbole over a change that still works when I try it. The fact that it's not a change with which you agree does not invalidate my experience or opinion. "Some of us understand an apples to oranges comparison when we see it." That implies I lack understanding because I do not agree with you. Your experience and opinions are also valid but they are not better than mine and I do not appreciate the implication. No one's experience or opinions are less than yours just because they disagree with you. The change from pact magic to that spell progression did not break the class. It made it different than it was and it still works. The higher level spells are still in the [I]mystic arcanum [/I]invocation instead and that could come a bit earlier. The damage is still there in EB and there's more utility in the spell progression now so using [I]mystic arcanum [/I]to add a spell like [I]fireball [/I]at the same level as a wizard or sorcerer is still an option. If you think it's an apples to oranges comparison please explain why. We can discuss that without the micro-aggression. I don't agree with the implementation being half-assed. I do prefer [I]pact magic [/I]and plan on putting that in my feedback. It didn't make the class unplayable or radically nerfed, however. Who are "these people"? That's placing anyone who doesn't agree with you into a category of a lesser person. Your opinions do not invalidate anyone else. That's the type of toxic attitude we don't need on this site. Go hydrated. Eat a Snickers. Relax. And then post why you prefer your opinion instead of expressing that type of aggression. It's okay. :) [/QUOTE]

Verification