Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
They hybrid Roll N' Buy ability score generation method
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shaele" data-source="post: 132583" data-attributes="member: 3071"><p>--Al----</p><p>Experienced RPers take what they get and make what they can of it: poor stat characters are more interesting that the straight-18 ultra. The trick is not to throw out the baby with the bathwater- the system is good, but the players may be lousy. So the solution? Change the players, not the system. </p><p>--------</p><p></p><p>Umm, pardon?</p><p></p><p>I read your post twice to make sure I didn't misunderstand, and I humbly disagree. The _purpose_ of a system should be to create characters that are (a) representative of the power level set by the DM, (b) more or less "fair" and balanced against one another, and (c) fun for the players. If it doesn't accomplish that, it's a poor system. Players first, rules second.</p><p></p><p>Low-stat characters aren't inherently "more interesting" than average or high-stat characters. Balance and consistency is much more important that "forcing everyone to have a low stat". Point-buy is helpful in that respect, because it's fair - everyone gets the same points. The problem with any system that gives a wide variation, based on a die roll, is that once in a while someone will roll up a pathetic character (or an uber one). </p><p></p><p>Have you ever DM'ed a party where one character has (for example) 3-18s, while the rest have average or lower stats? If the palyer min-maxes properly, he can _completely_ dominate gameplay. Conversely, this type of system also allows for the "almost completely useless" character as well. Neither scenario is desirable, for the DM or the players.</p><p></p><p>If the purpose of this type of system is to force variation and roleplaying (however you define that), why not insist on non-metagame elements instead? Ask people for character histories, background... ask them to detail personality quirks, desires, and roleplay according to that? You'll get much more depth in characters than telling the mage to "play like you have a 4 wisdom, since that's what a real roleplayer would do".</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shaele, post: 132583, member: 3071"] --Al---- Experienced RPers take what they get and make what they can of it: poor stat characters are more interesting that the straight-18 ultra. The trick is not to throw out the baby with the bathwater- the system is good, but the players may be lousy. So the solution? Change the players, not the system. -------- Umm, pardon? I read your post twice to make sure I didn't misunderstand, and I humbly disagree. The _purpose_ of a system should be to create characters that are (a) representative of the power level set by the DM, (b) more or less "fair" and balanced against one another, and (c) fun for the players. If it doesn't accomplish that, it's a poor system. Players first, rules second. Low-stat characters aren't inherently "more interesting" than average or high-stat characters. Balance and consistency is much more important that "forcing everyone to have a low stat". Point-buy is helpful in that respect, because it's fair - everyone gets the same points. The problem with any system that gives a wide variation, based on a die roll, is that once in a while someone will roll up a pathetic character (or an uber one). Have you ever DM'ed a party where one character has (for example) 3-18s, while the rest have average or lower stats? If the palyer min-maxes properly, he can _completely_ dominate gameplay. Conversely, this type of system also allows for the "almost completely useless" character as well. Neither scenario is desirable, for the DM or the players. If the purpose of this type of system is to force variation and roleplaying (however you define that), why not insist on non-metagame elements instead? Ask people for character histories, background... ask them to detail personality quirks, desires, and roleplay according to that? You'll get much more depth in characters than telling the mage to "play like you have a 4 wisdom, since that's what a real roleplayer would do". [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
They hybrid Roll N' Buy ability score generation method
Top