Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Things from 3e (inc PF) not done well
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nemesis Destiny" data-source="post: 5771317" data-attributes="member: 98255"><p>Most of what I think they could improve was already covered, but I'll add my list to the pile. What I remember of it, that is.</p><p></p><p>The Game</p><p>- nightmarish to DM past the single-digit levels</p><p>- monster design complexity</p><p>- quadratic casters / linear warriors</p><p>- save-or-die / save-or-suck</p><p>- horribly broken multiclassing</p><p>- fiddly skill system does a better job defining what you can't do than what you can</p><p>- prestige class power creep</p><p>- too many feats</p><p>- character design complexity</p><p>- lots of "trap" options & dead-ends</p><p>- clerics as healbots</p><p>- wands of CLW abuse</p><p>- annoying buff spells</p><p>- scry-buff-teleport cheese</p><p>- MADness / every stat mattered too much</p><p>- CoDzilla</p><p>- sneak attack being ineffective on most enemy types</p><p>- nothing for warriors (esp. fighters) to do but swing away, round after round</p><p>- combat abilities compete with non-combat abilities for PC resources</p><p>- christmas tree effect / wealth-by-level rules</p><p>- saving throw numberss break down in low double-digit levels</p><p>- BAB scaling and too much disparity in melee classes</p><p>- full attack nonsense</p><p>- spellcasters (esp wizards) that ran out of spells were useless</p><p>- spellcasters having to resort to thrown weapons or crossbows is bad design</p><p>- alignment mechanics (XP penalties for changing, spells keyed to alignment, etc)</p><p>- building a character became ridiculous near the end, hunting through all the books</p><p>- paladins in general</p><p>- monks in general</p><p></p><p>Other (PF improved on most of these)</p><p>- presentation</p><p>- tone</p><p>- most of the art</p><p>- iconics</p><p>- "feel" - contrary to what a lot of people say, 3.x did not maintain the "classic" feel of D&D for me or my gaming group. This mystifies me when people complain about 4e lacking the "feel" of D&D. It doesn't feel like 3.x, just like 3.x didn't feel like AD&D. So when they say they like PF because if "feels" like D&D, what that really says to me is that they like it because it feels like 3.x. Not a selling point IMO.</p><p></p><p>There are probably more things, but this is all I care to invest in thinking about it for now. I'd rather discuss what 5e should include among its options, than discuss what it shouldn't. In order to please everyone, as they say, they're going to have to include a lot of things, and make them optional, and what they do include by default will have to be replaceable, or provide the ability to "switch off."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nemesis Destiny, post: 5771317, member: 98255"] Most of what I think they could improve was already covered, but I'll add my list to the pile. What I remember of it, that is. The Game - nightmarish to DM past the single-digit levels - monster design complexity - quadratic casters / linear warriors - save-or-die / save-or-suck - horribly broken multiclassing - fiddly skill system does a better job defining what you can't do than what you can - prestige class power creep - too many feats - character design complexity - lots of "trap" options & dead-ends - clerics as healbots - wands of CLW abuse - annoying buff spells - scry-buff-teleport cheese - MADness / every stat mattered too much - CoDzilla - sneak attack being ineffective on most enemy types - nothing for warriors (esp. fighters) to do but swing away, round after round - combat abilities compete with non-combat abilities for PC resources - christmas tree effect / wealth-by-level rules - saving throw numberss break down in low double-digit levels - BAB scaling and too much disparity in melee classes - full attack nonsense - spellcasters (esp wizards) that ran out of spells were useless - spellcasters having to resort to thrown weapons or crossbows is bad design - alignment mechanics (XP penalties for changing, spells keyed to alignment, etc) - building a character became ridiculous near the end, hunting through all the books - paladins in general - monks in general Other (PF improved on most of these) - presentation - tone - most of the art - iconics - "feel" - contrary to what a lot of people say, 3.x did not maintain the "classic" feel of D&D for me or my gaming group. This mystifies me when people complain about 4e lacking the "feel" of D&D. It doesn't feel like 3.x, just like 3.x didn't feel like AD&D. So when they say they like PF because if "feels" like D&D, what that really says to me is that they like it because it feels like 3.x. Not a selling point IMO. There are probably more things, but this is all I care to invest in thinking about it for now. I'd rather discuss what 5e should include among its options, than discuss what it shouldn't. In order to please everyone, as they say, they're going to have to include a lot of things, and make them optional, and what they do include by default will have to be replaceable, or provide the ability to "switch off." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Things from 3e (inc PF) not done well
Top