Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Things that "need" errata
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celtavian" data-source="post: 6618612" data-attributes="member: 5834"><p>What would I like to see errata for from experience and analysis:</p><p></p><p>1. <em>Contagion</em>: This spell needs a rewrite. Add "Does not affect undead and constructs." Change when the spell takes effect or how it takes effect. Don't ruin it and make it so weak as to be not worth taking for standard combat. I've always wanted an effective disease attack spell. The idea of it is very cool. As it is currently written, it is an "I win" attack as soon as it lands. No spell should be that clear an "I win" button.</p><p></p><p>2. Boost familiar hit points. These things are way too weak at higher level. Maybe make it so a higher level slot boosts their hit points or something. They need to be able to survive a hit or three. Using a higher level slot would prevent easy recovery of a stronger familiar during the adventuring day, while still allowing it to last longer for standard adventuring. It's getting to the point where any time this guy goes scouting or goes near combat, he's dead with one hit.</p><p></p><p>3. Change Great Weapon Master and Sharp-Shooter added damage to once a turn like Sneak Attack or nearly every other damage boosting ability. Sharpshooter is powerful enough removing all the penalties for cover other than total cover. Great Weapon Master's bonus action extra attack every time they drop something or crit adds enough additional damage every few rounds.</p><p></p><p>4. Giver other Sorcerer archetypes in the PHB bonus spells. Seems like they should have had them to begin with given the extremely low number of spells Sorcerer's receive. </p><p></p><p>5. <em>Project Image</em> is no longer a 7th level spell. Make it 5th level. It might be useful at a level where you have some slots to spare.</p><p></p><p>6. Remove concentration requirement from <em>protection from energy</em>. Insert in spell text can only have one <em>protection from energy</em> spell active at one time. This spell taking up a concentration slot is inappropriate and makes it far inferior to <em>protection from poison</em> and <em>fire shield</em>. </p><p></p><p>7. Add a couple of damage cantrips to clerics. <em>Sacred Flame</em> does not fit all clerics. Add some variety. Even an Unearthed Arcana article with some cantrips for different types of clerics would be nice. Some elemental damage for Tempest clerics. Some psychic and necromantic damage for Trickery and Knowledge clerics.</p><p></p><p>8. Unconscious or paralyzed target loses Dex on AC. It's just hard to imagine the target still gaining Dex to AC while in either state. It's really hurts suspension of disbelief. </p><p></p><p>9. <em>Power Word Kill</em> and the Demilich: Please give the demilich some means to resist this spell. It is extremely anticlimactic if the party gets to the demilich, the wizard speaks one word, and the battle is over. We don't need that kind of situation in the game.</p><p></p><p>Some things I don't want to see errata:</p><p>1. Stealth: Leave it up to the DM. There is not now and never will be a way to cover all aspects of Stealth with a written rule. Nearly every situation in which stealth is used is different. The current guidelines are fine. DMs should adjudicate Stealth according to environmental circumstances. I have seen numerous attempts in D&D to write adequate and clear Stealth rules. It never works because there are far too many variables that affect Stealth. It's always going to come down to the DM making a call in a given set of circumstances. That should be the clearly stated rule along with the guidelines for what is gained if Stealth is usable within a given set of circumstances. I think the current guidelines cover it well enough for a DM to make a call.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celtavian, post: 6618612, member: 5834"] What would I like to see errata for from experience and analysis: 1. [I]Contagion[/I]: This spell needs a rewrite. Add "Does not affect undead and constructs." Change when the spell takes effect or how it takes effect. Don't ruin it and make it so weak as to be not worth taking for standard combat. I've always wanted an effective disease attack spell. The idea of it is very cool. As it is currently written, it is an "I win" attack as soon as it lands. No spell should be that clear an "I win" button. 2. Boost familiar hit points. These things are way too weak at higher level. Maybe make it so a higher level slot boosts their hit points or something. They need to be able to survive a hit or three. Using a higher level slot would prevent easy recovery of a stronger familiar during the adventuring day, while still allowing it to last longer for standard adventuring. It's getting to the point where any time this guy goes scouting or goes near combat, he's dead with one hit. 3. Change Great Weapon Master and Sharp-Shooter added damage to once a turn like Sneak Attack or nearly every other damage boosting ability. Sharpshooter is powerful enough removing all the penalties for cover other than total cover. Great Weapon Master's bonus action extra attack every time they drop something or crit adds enough additional damage every few rounds. 4. Giver other Sorcerer archetypes in the PHB bonus spells. Seems like they should have had them to begin with given the extremely low number of spells Sorcerer's receive. 5. [I]Project Image[/I] is no longer a 7th level spell. Make it 5th level. It might be useful at a level where you have some slots to spare. 6. Remove concentration requirement from [I]protection from energy[/I]. Insert in spell text can only have one [I]protection from energy[/I] spell active at one time. This spell taking up a concentration slot is inappropriate and makes it far inferior to [I]protection from poison[/I] and [I]fire shield[/I]. 7. Add a couple of damage cantrips to clerics. [I]Sacred Flame[/I] does not fit all clerics. Add some variety. Even an Unearthed Arcana article with some cantrips for different types of clerics would be nice. Some elemental damage for Tempest clerics. Some psychic and necromantic damage for Trickery and Knowledge clerics. 8. Unconscious or paralyzed target loses Dex on AC. It's just hard to imagine the target still gaining Dex to AC while in either state. It's really hurts suspension of disbelief. 9. [I]Power Word Kill[/I] and the Demilich: Please give the demilich some means to resist this spell. It is extremely anticlimactic if the party gets to the demilich, the wizard speaks one word, and the battle is over. We don't need that kind of situation in the game. Some things I don't want to see errata: 1. Stealth: Leave it up to the DM. There is not now and never will be a way to cover all aspects of Stealth with a written rule. Nearly every situation in which stealth is used is different. The current guidelines are fine. DMs should adjudicate Stealth according to environmental circumstances. I have seen numerous attempts in D&D to write adequate and clear Stealth rules. It never works because there are far too many variables that affect Stealth. It's always going to come down to the DM making a call in a given set of circumstances. That should be the clearly stated rule along with the guidelines for what is gained if Stealth is usable within a given set of circumstances. I think the current guidelines cover it well enough for a DM to make a call. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Things that "need" errata
Top