Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
This is why pathfinder has been successful.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TheAuldGrump" data-source="post: 5799337" data-attributes="member: 6957"><p>At least this time they are <em>doing</em> marketing research, and hopefully listening to the research and paying <em>attention</em> to playtesters. (Yes, the debacle with the skill DCs still ticks me off.)</p><p></p><p>Deep down, I suspect and fear that 5e will fail. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f641.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" data-smilie="3"data-shortname=":(" /> I don't want it to fail, but I think that WotC broke their market with 4e and the way they rolled it out. I don't think that they <em>can</em> mend the divide.</p><p></p><p>Still no word, as far as I know, on what I consider the most important piece - the license. And the longer they wait the more I suspect that it is going to be another attempt at the GSL, rather than a return to the OGL.</p><p></p><p>I like the Pathfinder rules better than 4e, but I do not blame the rules for the divide - I blame the marketing during the run up to 4e, and the attitude in some of the books, rather than the rules themselves.</p><p></p><p>Pathfinder, especially since the APG, fits my needs better than 4e - I would have to work around the rules in 4e to get the results that I want (much as some folks claim for 3.X/3.P). It would be awkward and unnecessary, since I have Pathfinder to hand. </p><p></p><p>The failure of marketing for 4e worked to my advantage - had they done their job right in regards to marketing then I would almost certainly not have Pathfinder.</p><p></p><p>And I <em>know</em> that Paizo listens....</p><p></p><p> In my estimate it makes it a less entertaining RPG - there is a reason that I don't play 4e. If it results in a game that I don't want to play then it <em>does</em> have square wheels, as far as I am concerned.</p><p></p><p>I hated what they did to spellcasters in 4e.</p><p></p><p>However, I should possibly mention that there was (once upon a time) a comedian that did a routine on parking in San Francisco, and part of the routine was to suggest square wheels so that the car wouldn't roll downhill, even with the parking brake on....</p><p></p><p>Given that I saw that routine on TV something like thirty years ago, I think that it is fair to say that I have fumbled my roll for Pop Culture References.....</p><p></p><p>The Auld Grump, as I have said many times before, I never repeat myself....</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TheAuldGrump, post: 5799337, member: 6957"] At least this time they are [i]doing[/i] marketing research, and hopefully listening to the research and paying [i]attention[/i] to playtesters. (Yes, the debacle with the skill DCs still ticks me off.) Deep down, I suspect and fear that 5e will fail. :( I don't want it to fail, but I think that WotC broke their market with 4e and the way they rolled it out. I don't think that they [i]can[/i] mend the divide. Still no word, as far as I know, on what I consider the most important piece - the license. And the longer they wait the more I suspect that it is going to be another attempt at the GSL, rather than a return to the OGL. I like the Pathfinder rules better than 4e, but I do not blame the rules for the divide - I blame the marketing during the run up to 4e, and the attitude in some of the books, rather than the rules themselves. Pathfinder, especially since the APG, fits my needs better than 4e - I would have to work around the rules in 4e to get the results that I want (much as some folks claim for 3.X/3.P). It would be awkward and unnecessary, since I have Pathfinder to hand. The failure of marketing for 4e worked to my advantage - had they done their job right in regards to marketing then I would almost certainly not have Pathfinder. And I [i]know[/i] that Paizo listens.... In my estimate it makes it a less entertaining RPG - there is a reason that I don't play 4e. If it results in a game that I don't want to play then it [i]does[/i] have square wheels, as far as I am concerned. I hated what they did to spellcasters in 4e. However, I should possibly mention that there was (once upon a time) a comedian that did a routine on parking in San Francisco, and part of the routine was to suggest square wheels so that the car wouldn't roll downhill, even with the parking brake on.... Given that I saw that routine on TV something like thirty years ago, I think that it is fair to say that I have fumbled my roll for Pop Culture References..... The Auld Grump, as I have said many times before, I never repeat myself.... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
This is why pathfinder has been successful.
Top