Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
This Makes No Sense: Re-Examining the 1e Bard
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Snarf Zagyg" data-source="post: 9755907" data-attributes="member: 7023840"><p>As I already suggested, if you want to play a Bard in 1e (WHY? FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THAT IS GOOD, WHY?), I recommend playing one of the excellent single-class options I mentioned earlier.</p><p></p><p>To me, the issue with the 1e Appendix Bard is how half-.... quarter-baked it is. Not only are the rules non-sensical (as in, they literally don't make sense and require multiple houserules), but the class itself doesn't make sense compared to the other classes. The closest comparator is the 1e Monk, and even that class looks correctly balanced and well-thought out compared to the 1e Appendix Bard.</p><p></p><p>Essentially, you have a multitude of problems.</p><p></p><p>First, you don't actually become your class until "name level" play. Essentially, you become a Bard when all of your companions are 9th level or beyond (depending on how you do levelling). And that's weird. But it gets worse!</p><p></p><p>Because the Bard's class doesn't recognize this... look at the XP levels- you're essentially a level 1 PC. While everyone else needs multiple hundreds of thousands of XP to advance a single level, you need .... only 150,001 to get to 11th level!</p><p></p><p>THAT IS CRAZY. But do you know what's crazier- compare that to the Druid. </p><p></p><p>Imagine you are "maxing" your fighter level (7) and thief level (8). You need 70,001 xp for fighter and ... 70,001 xp for thief, for a total of 140,002 xp for max F/T (and you want to max fighter levels, since that will always be your attack ability). With me?</p><p></p><p>To make Druid 14, you need 1,500,001 xp, along with having won in combat against Druids at levels 12, 13, and 14.</p><p></p><p>To make Bard 18, you need 1,400,001 xp. Are you following me? So, you can hit (depending on how you level) F7/T8/B18 before the Druid gets to level 14. And without engaging in any combats. </p><p></p><p>That means that not only do you have the fighter and thief abilities, but you <em>also have all the abilities of a 14th level druid, except you can't cast as many spells</em>. At that point, you're stuck at 4/4/4/3/3, while a 13th level Druid is 6/5/5/5/4/3/2</p><p></p><p>Essentially, you will always have all the abilities of the Druid, sooner (once you shift), never having to deal with the Druid sacrifices (weapons, armor, combat against other druids, etc.), with all sorts of other cool abilities, and only sacrificing 6th and 7th level spells.</p><p></p><p>IMO, the class simply doesn't work as written. It doesn't mean that you can't have fun with it in a certain type of campaign, but it's not ... the design problems are just so deep that even if square the circle of all the other rules, it's just a bad design.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Snarf Zagyg, post: 9755907, member: 7023840"] As I already suggested, if you want to play a Bard in 1e (WHY? FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THAT IS GOOD, WHY?), I recommend playing one of the excellent single-class options I mentioned earlier. To me, the issue with the 1e Appendix Bard is how half-.... quarter-baked it is. Not only are the rules non-sensical (as in, they literally don't make sense and require multiple houserules), but the class itself doesn't make sense compared to the other classes. The closest comparator is the 1e Monk, and even that class looks correctly balanced and well-thought out compared to the 1e Appendix Bard. Essentially, you have a multitude of problems. First, you don't actually become your class until "name level" play. Essentially, you become a Bard when all of your companions are 9th level or beyond (depending on how you do levelling). And that's weird. But it gets worse! Because the Bard's class doesn't recognize this... look at the XP levels- you're essentially a level 1 PC. While everyone else needs multiple hundreds of thousands of XP to advance a single level, you need .... only 150,001 to get to 11th level! THAT IS CRAZY. But do you know what's crazier- compare that to the Druid. Imagine you are "maxing" your fighter level (7) and thief level (8). You need 70,001 xp for fighter and ... 70,001 xp for thief, for a total of 140,002 xp for max F/T (and you want to max fighter levels, since that will always be your attack ability). With me? To make Druid 14, you need 1,500,001 xp, along with having won in combat against Druids at levels 12, 13, and 14. To make Bard 18, you need 1,400,001 xp. Are you following me? So, you can hit (depending on how you level) F7/T8/B18 before the Druid gets to level 14. And without engaging in any combats. That means that not only do you have the fighter and thief abilities, but you [I]also have all the abilities of a 14th level druid, except you can't cast as many spells[/I]. At that point, you're stuck at 4/4/4/3/3, while a 13th level Druid is 6/5/5/5/4/3/2 Essentially, you will always have all the abilities of the Druid, sooner (once you shift), never having to deal with the Druid sacrifices (weapons, armor, combat against other druids, etc.), with all sorts of other cool abilities, and only sacrificing 6th and 7th level spells. IMO, the class simply doesn't work as written. It doesn't mean that you can't have fun with it in a certain type of campaign, but it's not ... the design problems are just so deep that even if square the circle of all the other rules, it's just a bad design. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
This Makes No Sense: Re-Examining the 1e Bard
Top