Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="I'm A Banana" data-source="post: 5095727" data-attributes="member: 2067">I don't see it.I see thinking that everyone should have powers, but, heck, 3e already had that basic concept (Cleave was a power, as was Whirlwind Strike, as were a lot of fighter feats), and it's a good idea to have specific abilities you can look forward to. I, in fact, see that they stepped BACK from "lots of powers." Not far enough, IMO, but still.I don't think that Rob was envisioning a situation like this, where the game stops while people debate which abilities they can actually use to overcome an obstacle. That's as bad as a newbie with a level 20 wizard in earlier editions. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>