Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Primal" data-source="post: 5097086" data-attributes="member: 30678">I'm with you there. If 'Darkfire' had the Fire keyword, I'd agree with KM; however, it doesn't produce "real" flames as it is the 4E version of 'Faerie Fire'. Maybe Chris should have described what the power actually does, instead of proclaiming that it can only target actual creatures but still I think he made the right call in this situation. Yeah, the player in question tried to be creative, but allowing any power or ability with the word 'fire' in its name to do actual fire damage is a bad idea, IMO. What if he had would say on the next session "You know guys, I can just burn down that inn with my 'Darkfire', so we can let the bad guys roast in there"? By always saying 'yes' you can easily end up in situations in which you have to make decisions that contradict your previous rulings.I think this looks like a great adventure... as I said, I don't like the map and I would never reveal the whole complex/level to my players (instead, they need to map it room by room and corridor by corridor). Also, Chris said he had very little time to prepare, but I wouldn't have guessed it based on his DMing. Even though I'm a dedicated PF fan, these videos actually got me mildly interested in trying out 4E.</blockquote>