Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
This Weekend at the Boxoffice: 2006.07.10
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Wayside" data-source="post: 2942056" data-attributes="member: 8394"><p>First, I'm not looking for Superman to fail. Neither it nor X3 were the movies they should have been, and I expected their second weekends and general earnings to be much closer, with Superman probably in the lead.</p><p></p><p>Second, the comparison between the two is completely natural since Singer was supposed to direct X3 but left the project for Superman. And then there's Ratner, whom everyone loves to hate. All the drama surrounding the films made them natural competitors.</p><p></p><p>And finally, it's not sad. A lot of very vocal people went on and on about the sky falling when Singer left and Ratner signed on (they gave us a repeat performance when X3 finally appeared and wasn't to their taste). The numbers have more or less silenced those people. </p><p></p><p></p><p>We could play the qualification game all day long. You see a generic date movie (or pretend to for rhetorical purposes), while I see a highly anticipated Vince & Jennifer movie that had an endless amount of publicity (more than X3, Superman and Pirates put together) over the past, what, year? Or longer?</p><p></p><p>You see Pirates "doing" something to Superman? I see domestic box office top 12 totals of $129,197,589 for Superman's opening weekend and $209,881,552 for this past weekend. That's a difference of 80 million, which is 30 million <em>more </em> than Superman made in its opening weekend. You can conjecture that Pirates stole viewers from Superman, but all I see is Pirates drawing in viewers who simply wouldn't have gone to the movies if Pirates wasn't playing. Pirates drummed up its own business--it didn't steal Superman's.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Possible, and meaningless. A movie can make 20 million one week and be in the top spot, while another movie can make 40 million another week and come in third. Being in the top spot doesn't make the first movie more successful than the second.</p><p></p><p></p><p>And here we have a perfect example of why some people apparently take delight in Superman's weak Returns (pun intended)!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Wayside, post: 2942056, member: 8394"] First, I'm not looking for Superman to fail. Neither it nor X3 were the movies they should have been, and I expected their second weekends and general earnings to be much closer, with Superman probably in the lead. Second, the comparison between the two is completely natural since Singer was supposed to direct X3 but left the project for Superman. And then there's Ratner, whom everyone loves to hate. All the drama surrounding the films made them natural competitors. And finally, it's not sad. A lot of very vocal people went on and on about the sky falling when Singer left and Ratner signed on (they gave us a repeat performance when X3 finally appeared and wasn't to their taste). The numbers have more or less silenced those people. We could play the qualification game all day long. You see a generic date movie (or pretend to for rhetorical purposes), while I see a highly anticipated Vince & Jennifer movie that had an endless amount of publicity (more than X3, Superman and Pirates put together) over the past, what, year? Or longer? You see Pirates "doing" something to Superman? I see domestic box office top 12 totals of $129,197,589 for Superman's opening weekend and $209,881,552 for this past weekend. That's a difference of 80 million, which is 30 million [I]more [/I] than Superman made in its opening weekend. You can conjecture that Pirates stole viewers from Superman, but all I see is Pirates drawing in viewers who simply wouldn't have gone to the movies if Pirates wasn't playing. Pirates drummed up its own business--it didn't steal Superman's. Possible, and meaningless. A movie can make 20 million one week and be in the top spot, while another movie can make 40 million another week and come in third. Being in the top spot doesn't make the first movie more successful than the second. And here we have a perfect example of why some people apparently take delight in Superman's weak Returns (pun intended)! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
This Weekend at the Boxoffice: 2006.07.10
Top