Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
This whole, changing the backstory thing...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sundragon2012" data-source="post: 3854709" data-attributes="member: 7624"><p>When I waqs far, far younger and far, far newer to DMing I used to care a great deal about using the TSR backstory because it felt I was playing the "real" D&D. Looking back on those times I understand that I simply lacked the confidence of my own creative talents as a DM and wanted my campaign validated by keeping it by the book. My players ever expected this of me.</p><p></p><p>Then as the years progressed I realized that every campaign setting was someone's homebrew. Dragonlance was Weis and Hickman's. FR was Greenwood's homebrew. Greyhawk was Gygax's homebrew. And so it goes. All the best settings were someone's homebrews existing merely in another's imagination until set to print by TSR and WoTC.</p><p></p><p>It goes without saying that a DM has to change the backstory or even dramatically alter a great many things in oder to create a setting that isn't just like every other setting. So what is the big deal if WoTC changes the backstory to succubi or dump the Great Wheel unless you are simply cracking open books and DMing the utterly colorless "core" setting as is. This is supposed to be Greyhawk in 3.5, but Greyhawk fans know the violence done to their favorite setting by making it the vanilla backdrop for the game and home to every idea from every splatbook by default.</p><p></p><p>I don't know any DMs who have been DMing for a while who do not use a published setting such as FR or Eberron or create their own setting. I don't know why is matters what WoTC does in regards to succubi, the nature of demons and devils or whether or not the Great Wheel still exists if each setting diverges strongly from so many core assumptions anyway.</p><p></p><p>In my experience no homebrew or published setting in the 3.5 era has been slavishly following core assumptions so I would argue it is irrelevent what WoTC does or does not do to the backstory of D&Ds critters, planes and mythos.</p><p></p><p>Rules changes....well they can be a problem, but fluff....no problem at all.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sundragon</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sundragon2012, post: 3854709, member: 7624"] When I waqs far, far younger and far, far newer to DMing I used to care a great deal about using the TSR backstory because it felt I was playing the "real" D&D. Looking back on those times I understand that I simply lacked the confidence of my own creative talents as a DM and wanted my campaign validated by keeping it by the book. My players ever expected this of me. Then as the years progressed I realized that every campaign setting was someone's homebrew. Dragonlance was Weis and Hickman's. FR was Greenwood's homebrew. Greyhawk was Gygax's homebrew. And so it goes. All the best settings were someone's homebrews existing merely in another's imagination until set to print by TSR and WoTC. It goes without saying that a DM has to change the backstory or even dramatically alter a great many things in oder to create a setting that isn't just like every other setting. So what is the big deal if WoTC changes the backstory to succubi or dump the Great Wheel unless you are simply cracking open books and DMing the utterly colorless "core" setting as is. This is supposed to be Greyhawk in 3.5, but Greyhawk fans know the violence done to their favorite setting by making it the vanilla backdrop for the game and home to every idea from every splatbook by default. I don't know any DMs who have been DMing for a while who do not use a published setting such as FR or Eberron or create their own setting. I don't know why is matters what WoTC does in regards to succubi, the nature of demons and devils or whether or not the Great Wheel still exists if each setting diverges strongly from so many core assumptions anyway. In my experience no homebrew or published setting in the 3.5 era has been slavishly following core assumptions so I would argue it is irrelevent what WoTC does or does not do to the backstory of D&Ds critters, planes and mythos. Rules changes....well they can be a problem, but fluff....no problem at all. Sundragon [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
This whole, changing the backstory thing...
Top