Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="evildmguy" data-source="post: 9312054" data-attributes="member: 6092">Ugh.&nbsp; Yep, that's RAW.&nbsp; I declare stupid.&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue&nbsp; &nbsp; :p"&nbsp; data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" />&nbsp; What is the character reacting to on their turn??&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f641.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":(" title="Frown&nbsp; &nbsp; :("&nbsp; data-smilie="3"data-shortname=":(" /><img class="smilie smilie--emoji" alt="🤦‍♂️" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f926-2642.png" title="Man facepalming&nbsp; &nbsp; :man_facepalming:" data-shortname=":man_facepalming:" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" />I want to waste fighter actions, at least when it comes to SA.&nbsp; That's the reason I'm suggesting that.&nbsp; I have more of a problem with the six second round.&nbsp; Bob World Builder, after practice, could barely finish drinking a four ounce potion in six seconds.&nbsp; He had no time to move, do a bonus action, or reaction in that time.&nbsp; I know that combat is probably faster in real life but I'm fine with slowing it down, and taking longer, for the drama and story telling aspect of it.&nbsp; I do like that 4E introduced something like this.&nbsp; It does mean having conditions build on each other.&nbsp; For example, turn to stone becomes slowed -&gt; restrained -&gt; petrified.&nbsp; It might require needing more conditions to do this but that works for me.&nbsp; As for doing this with Stun or other similar conditions, I like the idea that once a creature has been stunned, they are immune for some amount of time, which is common with other abilities.&nbsp; Further, I think the stunned character should get another save at the start of their turn to have a turn and then it ends at the end of their turn.&nbsp; That also seems to follow other patterns.&nbsp; Thanks for the discussion!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="evildmguy, post: 9312054, member: 6092"] Ugh. Yep, that's RAW. I declare stupid. :p What is the character reacting to on their turn?? :(🤦‍♂️ I want to waste fighter actions, at least when it comes to SA. That's the reason I'm suggesting that. I have more of a problem with the six second round. Bob World Builder, after practice, could barely finish drinking a four ounce potion in six seconds. He had no time to move, do a bonus action, or reaction in that time. I know that combat is probably faster in real life but I'm fine with slowing it down, and taking longer, for the drama and story telling aspect of it. I do like that 4E introduced something like this. It does mean having conditions build on each other. For example, turn to stone becomes slowed -> restrained -> petrified. It might require needing more conditions to do this but that works for me. As for doing this with Stun or other similar conditions, I like the idea that once a creature has been stunned, they are immune for some amount of time, which is common with other abilities. Further, I think the stunned character should get another save at the start of their turn to have a turn and then it ends at the end of their turn. That also seems to follow other patterns. Thanks for the discussion! [/QUOTE]

Verification