Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Anonymous3" data-source="post: 9436454" data-attributes="member: 7046807">Thanks [USER=6975034]@thuter[/USER] !It seems clear me but I am not the best at rules interpretation. I don't mind that TWF gets a bit of love - extra attack using your bonus action (BA) is great but you are really starved of doing anything other than using attacking with your BA if you want to be comparable with your piers. Trying to understand how TWF works in comparable numbers to Two-handed Weapons (THW) has been quite a task for me.[USER=5889]@Stalker0[/USER] posted <a href="https://www.enworld.org/threads/fighter-specialization-best-maneuvers.684720/post-8484788" target="_blank">this</a> in which it was indicated that all attacks would benefit from Maneuver Specialization and uses THW in his example.Maneuver specialization (MS) states:Technical fighting (TF) states:They both reference multiple attacks when "using it" (a combat maneuver). Given that Fighters are the only class that get this fighting style is really neat because it means that are the "king" of maneuvers from both the DC and damage perspective.If you used Stunning Assault and attacked four times and hit four times that DC benefit from both MS and TF would apply (based on previous discussions on this). It seems consistent then that the damage would too.Is there anyone in the community is considered an "authority" on things like this?</blockquote>