Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Thoughts on Harry Potter d20
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HeavenShallBurn" data-source="post: 5832590" data-attributes="member: 39593"><p>That depends on how you interpret setting canon. They clearly do serve a purpose since they react to contact with wizards and can "fit" a wizard with vary degrees of compatibility. They also clearly aren't entirely necessary because we see that both accidental magic is possible and we see some wandless magic in use during the series. </p><p></p><p>I favor the interpretation that they serve primarily as a mental focus, just like words. Potterverse magic is above all else a direct application of force of will and belief to alter reality. The words are a mnemonic device Potterverse wizards are taught in order to make the mental focus and effort of their magic easier and more controllable. But wizards are expected to learn casting silently before they leave Hogwarts. Similarly I think wands need to be matched in order to properly conduct the magical energy used by wizards, but their primary purpose is to serve as a mental key so that wizards aren't doing magic with every stray thought. By conditioning them in such a way that they only do magic in concert with the wand it creates a subconscious association that mostly prevents them from working magic without it. </p><p></p><p>But for primarily setting reasons they would be considered a focus item (required to cast) unless characters bought that off via a feat or feat chain. One I personally wouldn't make available without significant in-character roleplay to justify.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HeavenShallBurn, post: 5832590, member: 39593"] That depends on how you interpret setting canon. They clearly do serve a purpose since they react to contact with wizards and can "fit" a wizard with vary degrees of compatibility. They also clearly aren't entirely necessary because we see that both accidental magic is possible and we see some wandless magic in use during the series. I favor the interpretation that they serve primarily as a mental focus, just like words. Potterverse magic is above all else a direct application of force of will and belief to alter reality. The words are a mnemonic device Potterverse wizards are taught in order to make the mental focus and effort of their magic easier and more controllable. But wizards are expected to learn casting silently before they leave Hogwarts. Similarly I think wands need to be matched in order to properly conduct the magical energy used by wizards, but their primary purpose is to serve as a mental key so that wizards aren't doing magic with every stray thought. By conditioning them in such a way that they only do magic in concert with the wand it creates a subconscious association that mostly prevents them from working magic without it. But for primarily setting reasons they would be considered a focus item (required to cast) unless characters bought that off via a feat or feat chain. One I personally wouldn't make available without significant in-character roleplay to justify. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Thoughts on Harry Potter d20
Top