Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 7064123" data-attributes="member: 7006">I ended up just giving my players the option of helping their saving throws by upping the power of the Resilient feat.&nbsp; In my current game it reads as follows:RESILIENT-&nbsp; &nbsp; You gain proficiency in one major saving throw (Dex, Con, Wis) plus one minor saving throw (Str, Int, Cha) of your choice.-&nbsp; &nbsp; You gain Expertise in any one saving throw you have proficiency in.So by spending one of their feat slots they end up with four saving throws they now are proficient in, and one of them they are REALLY resilient against.&nbsp; Now I'd like to tell you &quot;Yeah, it's been working great, no balance issues at all!&quot; with the feat's introduction... but the truth is none of my players having taken it yet.&nbsp; Heh.&nbsp; I'm expecting it to ultimately be fine, but have no evidence to support that contention at the moment.&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 7064123, member: 7006"] I ended up just giving my players the option of helping their saving throws by upping the power of the Resilient feat. In my current game it reads as follows: RESILIENT - You gain proficiency in one major saving throw (Dex, Con, Wis) plus one minor saving throw (Str, Int, Cha) of your choice. - You gain Expertise in any one saving throw you have proficiency in. So by spending one of their feat slots they end up with four saving throws they now are proficient in, and one of them they are REALLY resilient against. Now I'd like to tell you "Yeah, it's been working great, no balance issues at all!" with the feat's introduction... but the truth is none of my players having taken it yet. Heh. I'm [I]expecting[/I] it to ultimately be fine, but have no evidence to support that contention at the moment. ;) [/QUOTE]

Verification