Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="delphonso" data-source="post: 7998328" data-attributes="member: 6892015">To sum up, it seems the general consensus is that limits in official core rules are bad, but should be encouraged in setting books, or in your own settings, if it helps the story or leads players in a direction.Isolation is also necessary if you want it to make sense, so places like the Sword Coast and Zakhara make no sense. Unless it's somehow genetic - which, given the weirdness of DnD - might not limit it to one race.I forgot who posted it but I liked the point of bringing those limits into the game after character creation, if you wanted them. If my part is a dragonborn paladin, a half-orc monk, and a halfelf sorceror - maybe no half-orcs perform magic. Maybe no dragonborn has ever been a monk. Something to play with for those who want it.A paragon class could be interesting - I'd be happy with better racial feats, more focused on abilities being better like Dragon Fear.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="delphonso, post: 7998328, member: 6892015"] To sum up, it seems the general consensus is that limits in official core rules are bad, but should be encouraged in setting books, or in your own settings, if it helps the story or leads players in a direction. Isolation is also necessary if you want it to make sense, so places like the Sword Coast and Zakhara make no sense. Unless it's somehow genetic - which, given the weirdness of DnD - might not limit it to one race. I forgot who posted it but I liked the point of bringing those limits into the game after character creation, if you wanted them. If my part is a dragonborn paladin, a half-orc monk, and a halfelf sorceror - maybe no half-orcs perform magic. Maybe no dragonborn has ever been a monk. Something to play with for those who want it. A paragon class could be interesting - I'd be happy with better racial feats, more focused on abilities being better like Dragon Fear. [/QUOTE]

Verification