Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Saeviomagy" data-source="post: 4272887" data-attributes="member: 5890">You don't need to be so specific. You can just make a feat that says &quot;For the purpose of attacks, treat your unarmed strike as though you are wielding a dagger in any hand that is not otherwise occupied. Your unarmed strikes do not count as thrown weapons&quot;.That covers everyone. Warriors, warlords, rogues and rangers get proficiency. Other characters can choose proficiency. Rogues get their +1 dagger bonus (and can use shuriken for even more ninja flavour). All the light blade powers work. You can take twf and twd if you want.Oh, and putting any requirements on it seems like a bad idea. It's not a powerful feat (you're basically just getting the ability to always have one of the weakest melee weapons with you at all times) and it should be accessable to anyone who wants it. Your example rogue for instance has paid a feat in order to be 1 point of attack worse off than if he'd used a dagger.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Saeviomagy, post: 4272887, member: 5890"] You don't need to be so specific. You can just make a feat that says "For the purpose of attacks, treat your unarmed strike as though you are wielding a dagger in any hand that is not otherwise occupied. Your unarmed strikes do not count as thrown weapons". That covers everyone. Warriors, warlords, rogues and rangers get proficiency. Other characters can choose proficiency. Rogues get their +1 dagger bonus (and can use shuriken for even more ninja flavour). All the light blade powers work. You can take twf and twd if you want. Oh, and putting any requirements on it seems like a bad idea. It's not a powerful feat (you're basically just getting the ability to always have one of the weakest melee weapons with you at all times) and it should be accessable to anyone who wants it. Your example rogue for instance has paid a feat in order to be 1 point of attack worse off than if he'd used a dagger. [/QUOTE]

Verification