Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Benjamin Olson" data-source="post: 8212327" data-attributes="member: 6988941">Well, I strongly dislike taking away all the lower level spell slots from casters, as the continued relevance of many low level spells is something I like about 5e. But if it suits your goals, it suits your goals.However, if you are going to take away people's lower level spell slots then you should drop the one spell swap-out per level-up limitation on memorized casters. You should perhaps also lower the cost of Wizards copying spells of the levels that will face semi-retirement since they are obviously of less long term value.Or just do a campaign without any full casters, rather than worry about balancing a whole system of how to handicap them. I suspect any player who doesn't anticipate this being the permenent rules of all their future D&D games would just look at this scheme and decide to put off their next caster character for some other campaign.</blockquote>