Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="prodawg" data-source="post: 164687" data-attributes="member: 1304">Let's say that you have a unarmed cleric and an unarmed sorcerer.&nbsp; Both are medium size with 5 ft reach standing in adjacent squares.&nbsp; Both are unarmed, do not have unarmed attack feat, and not hasted.&nbsp; Please take a look at the following cases:1.&nbsp; If the sorcerer moves back 10 ft and casts a spell.&nbsp; If the cleric is armed with a melee weapon (threating an area), she would be entitled to an AoO.&nbsp; Since she is not, no AoO takes place.&nbsp; Right?2.&nbsp; Same case as number 1 except the cleric is armed with a crossbow.&nbsp; The result is the same because you do not threaten an area with a bow, so no AoO takes place as in case 1.&nbsp; Right?3.&nbsp; The cleric and sorcerer is standing 5 ft apart.&nbsp; The sorcerer tries to cast a spell without a concentration check (ie. not casting defensively).&nbsp; Is the unarmed cleric entitled to an AoO?&nbsp; The sorcerer is not in a threatened square, yet his spell casting triggers an AoO.&nbsp; I'm not too sure about this one.&nbsp; I have always thought that no AoO would take place because the cleric has nothing make a melee attack with.&nbsp; Right?4.&nbsp; Same case as 3 except the cleric is armed with a crossbow.&nbsp; No AoO because AoO must be made with a melee weapon.&nbsp; Right?Thanks for taking time to read this and to respond.*Edit: 5 ft apart &amp; no unarmed strike</blockquote>

[QUOTE="prodawg, post: 164687, member: 1304"] Let's say that you have a unarmed cleric and an unarmed sorcerer. Both are medium size with 5 ft reach standing in adjacent squares. Both are unarmed, do not have unarmed attack feat, and not hasted. Please take a look at the following cases: 1. If the sorcerer moves back 10 ft and casts a spell. If the cleric is armed with a melee weapon (threating an area), she would be entitled to an AoO. Since she is not, no AoO takes place. Right? 2. Same case as number 1 except the cleric is armed with a crossbow. The result is the same because you do not threaten an area with a bow, so no AoO takes place as in case 1. Right? 3. The cleric and sorcerer is standing 5 ft apart. The sorcerer tries to cast a spell without a concentration check (ie. not casting defensively). Is the unarmed cleric entitled to an AoO? The sorcerer is not in a threatened square, yet his spell casting triggers an AoO. I'm not too sure about this one. I have always thought that no AoO would take place because the cleric has nothing make a melee attack with. Right? 4. Same case as 3 except the cleric is armed with a crossbow. No AoO because AoO must be made with a melee weapon. Right? Thanks for taking time to read this and to respond. *Edit: 5 ft apart & no unarmed strike [/QUOTE]

Verification