Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Threatening with a shield
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BASHMAN" data-source="post: 3482826" data-attributes="member: 8277"><p>Then deciding to BASH with a shield should be treated as an immediate action that does not incur AOOs, meaning that when you have the opportunity to AOO with a shield, you have the option to do so. Deciding to attack with your shield should not be limited to your own turn-- you can decide to lose its shield bonus to AC if you want to take advantage of an AOO-- but the AC loss should be for a full round, not just until your next turn. That way, if the orc goes on 10 and you go on 9, and the orc incurs AOO, and you shield bash him, you don't immediately get your AC bonus back as you use your move action to draw a weapon and attack with it as a standard. You would get your AC bonus back on 10 of the following round. I think this would be a fair way to do it. </p><p></p><p>Of course, a person with improved shield bash should ALWAYS threaten with their shield. Otherwise, the DM is breaking their character concept. It is hard enough to make a Spartan with the crappy shortspear from 3.5, to make my bashing shield totally impotent as well would be too much!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BASHMAN, post: 3482826, member: 8277"] Then deciding to BASH with a shield should be treated as an immediate action that does not incur AOOs, meaning that when you have the opportunity to AOO with a shield, you have the option to do so. Deciding to attack with your shield should not be limited to your own turn-- you can decide to lose its shield bonus to AC if you want to take advantage of an AOO-- but the AC loss should be for a full round, not just until your next turn. That way, if the orc goes on 10 and you go on 9, and the orc incurs AOO, and you shield bash him, you don't immediately get your AC bonus back as you use your move action to draw a weapon and attack with it as a standard. You would get your AC bonus back on 10 of the following round. I think this would be a fair way to do it. Of course, a person with improved shield bash should ALWAYS threaten with their shield. Otherwise, the DM is breaking their character concept. It is hard enough to make a Spartan with the crappy shortspear from 3.5, to make my bashing shield totally impotent as well would be too much! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Threatening with a shield
Top