Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Three level 7 PCs vs a Roc in an open field...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Crimson Binome" data-source="post: 7162855" data-attributes="member: 6775031"><p>It might make the encounter harder than if they were to rule otherwise, but it's not like the encounter was supposed to be balanced in the first place. Maybe a Roc that can be stunned is properly CR 11, and a Roc that can't be stunned would more correctly be measured at CR 12. The party is level 7, and it sounds like this might be their only encounter of the day. All of the design assumptions, under which the math may have originally been balanced, is already being thrown out the window. As a general observation, a level 7 party can easily handle one CR 11 or CR 12 monster in a day, but the simple fact that you're not intended to run those sorts of encounters is enough to mean that it could potentially swing the other way with a couple of unlucky dice rolls.</p><p></p><p>In perfect seriousness, nothing in the book is balanced to account for a monk flurrying with stunning strikes. That exploit is a byproduct of informal writing and insufficient playtesting. Going by RAW, the monk should be able to keep the Roc stunlocked for at least two rounds (even with its massive +9 to Con saves), and the fighter will turn it into swiss cheese. If the DM rules that it can't be stunned, then the party should still win the fight with just numbers, but it will be less of a complete pushover.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Crimson Binome, post: 7162855, member: 6775031"] It might make the encounter harder than if they were to rule otherwise, but it's not like the encounter was supposed to be balanced in the first place. Maybe a Roc that can be stunned is properly CR 11, and a Roc that can't be stunned would more correctly be measured at CR 12. The party is level 7, and it sounds like this might be their only encounter of the day. All of the design assumptions, under which the math may have originally been balanced, is already being thrown out the window. As a general observation, a level 7 party can easily handle one CR 11 or CR 12 monster in a day, but the simple fact that you're not intended to run those sorts of encounters is enough to mean that it could potentially swing the other way with a couple of unlucky dice rolls. In perfect seriousness, nothing in the book is balanced to account for a monk flurrying with stunning strikes. That exploit is a byproduct of informal writing and insufficient playtesting. Going by RAW, the monk should be able to keep the Roc stunlocked for at least two rounds (even with its massive +9 to Con saves), and the fighter will turn it into swiss cheese. If the DM rules that it can't be stunned, then the party should still win the fight with just numbers, but it will be less of a complete pushover. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Three level 7 PCs vs a Roc in an open field...
Top