Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
EN Publishing
Three Milestones encounter (adventure 4) doesn't make sense to me
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jeffh" data-source="post: 9450215" data-attributes="member: 2642"><p>Question about Always on Time, the fourth Zeitgeist adventure. It's important context here that this adventure mostly takes place on a train.</p><p></p><p>In this encounter at the beginning of act 4, lanterns all over the train flash and, if all goes well for the bad guys, yank the PCs (and possibly a few others) into Nem, the land of the dead. Nem's <em>not </em>the Bleak Gate/Shadowfell, but it's related and in some ways similar - in particular, it contains counterparts of most things in the "real" world, notably the train. If the PCs get more than the titular three miles from the point where they entered Nem, they pass into the afterlife and die without the possibility of resurrection. Nasty, but they have multiple ways to avoid this and, once broken down into combat rounds, tons of of time.</p><p></p><p>(The times and distances don't seem consistent, but they should still have <em>at least</em> 18 rounds, maybe as many as 36-40 or so. That's <em>lots </em>in my group's hands, even if it's far less than the 60 the adventure as written gives them.)</p><p></p><p>Anyway, here's the <strong>main </strong>thing that confuses me. <strong>What exactly is "the point where they entered Nem"?</strong> Is it (a) the place where the train <em>was</em> when the trap was sprung, or (b) the place <em>on the train</em> where they entered, in other words relative to/moving with the train? The adventure does not seem to be internally consistent on this point.</p><p></p><p>It is repeatedly emphasized that if the train goes more than three miles they essentially get a Game Over screen, which strongly suggests (a). But then we are told this:</p><p></p><p>"If their souls leave the area of the lantern (in this case, they</p><p>would have to leave the train, because every car is affected by the lantern),</p><p>they instantly return to the spot where they first entered the plane</p><p>of Nem. This does not reset the “three mile” travel limit, so simply hopping</p><p>off the train will not save the party."</p><p></p><p>This passage is very confusing. "[T]he spot where they first entered the plane of Nem" is what the three mile limit is measured <em>from</em>. If (a) above is correct, why wouldn't exiting the train help? It would return them to the point where they entered, where they can wait out the lantern effect in relative safety. Or even if we ignore the bit about returning to your entry point, at worst it should stop them moving away from that point.</p><p></p><p>Other bits over the next page or two, such as the wraith's tactics, in one way clarify this, but in others make it <em>more</em> confusing. In those places, it seems to be assumed (though it's never quite explicitly spelled out) that leaving the train would return them to the point <em>on the train</em> where they entered Nem. In other words, these parts of the encounter seem to assume (b) above is correct, not (a). But if that's right, then why care about the three-mile limit? If <em>that's</em> how we're defining the point where they entered Nem, then it's moving with the train and thus trivial to wait out in relative safety. All they have to do is nothing; the only problem would be if they <em>did</em> get forced off the train somehow. The whole impetus of the encounter disappears.</p><p></p><p>The adventure seems to want (a) and (b) to <em>both</em> be correct for different purposes. And I mean, it's magic, I guess it can work however the writers want, but I don't see a clear explanation of which situations are which, much less get any logical sense of <em>why</em>.</p><p></p><p>In my mind, the least bad resolution that makes sense to me is to consistently go with (a) and just <em>let </em>the PCs find relative safety by jumping off the train if they think of it. A close second is skipping this encounter altogether, to be honest - on the surface it's a cool set piece, even if it doesn't stand up to much scrutiny, but it seems non-essential.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jeffh, post: 9450215, member: 2642"] Question about Always on Time, the fourth Zeitgeist adventure. It's important context here that this adventure mostly takes place on a train. In this encounter at the beginning of act 4, lanterns all over the train flash and, if all goes well for the bad guys, yank the PCs (and possibly a few others) into Nem, the land of the dead. Nem's [I]not [/I]the Bleak Gate/Shadowfell, but it's related and in some ways similar - in particular, it contains counterparts of most things in the "real" world, notably the train. If the PCs get more than the titular three miles from the point where they entered Nem, they pass into the afterlife and die without the possibility of resurrection. Nasty, but they have multiple ways to avoid this and, once broken down into combat rounds, tons of of time. (The times and distances don't seem consistent, but they should still have [I]at least[/I] 18 rounds, maybe as many as 36-40 or so. That's [I]lots [/I]in my group's hands, even if it's far less than the 60 the adventure as written gives them.) Anyway, here's the [B]main [/B]thing that confuses me. [B]What exactly is "the point where they entered Nem"?[/B] Is it (a) the place where the train [I]was[/I] when the trap was sprung, or (b) the place [I]on the train[/I] where they entered, in other words relative to/moving with the train? The adventure does not seem to be internally consistent on this point. It is repeatedly emphasized that if the train goes more than three miles they essentially get a Game Over screen, which strongly suggests (a). But then we are told this: "If their souls leave the area of the lantern (in this case, they would have to leave the train, because every car is affected by the lantern), they instantly return to the spot where they first entered the plane of Nem. This does not reset the “three mile” travel limit, so simply hopping off the train will not save the party." This passage is very confusing. "[T]he spot where they first entered the plane of Nem" is what the three mile limit is measured [I]from[/I]. If (a) above is correct, why wouldn't exiting the train help? It would return them to the point where they entered, where they can wait out the lantern effect in relative safety. Or even if we ignore the bit about returning to your entry point, at worst it should stop them moving away from that point. Other bits over the next page or two, such as the wraith's tactics, in one way clarify this, but in others make it [I]more[/I] confusing. In those places, it seems to be assumed (though it's never quite explicitly spelled out) that leaving the train would return them to the point [I]on the train[/I] where they entered Nem. In other words, these parts of the encounter seem to assume (b) above is correct, not (a). But if that's right, then why care about the three-mile limit? If [I]that's[/I] how we're defining the point where they entered Nem, then it's moving with the train and thus trivial to wait out in relative safety. All they have to do is nothing; the only problem would be if they [I]did[/I] get forced off the train somehow. The whole impetus of the encounter disappears. The adventure seems to want (a) and (b) to [I]both[/I] be correct for different purposes. And I mean, it's magic, I guess it can work however the writers want, but I don't see a clear explanation of which situations are which, much less get any logical sense of [I]why[/I]. In my mind, the least bad resolution that makes sense to me is to consistently go with (a) and just [I]let [/I]the PCs find relative safety by jumping off the train if they think of it. A close second is skipping this encounter altogether, to be honest - on the surface it's a cool set piece, even if it doesn't stand up to much scrutiny, but it seems non-essential. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
EN Publishing
Three Milestones encounter (adventure 4) doesn't make sense to me
Top