Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- Pocket Sized Adventures! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed for 1-2 game sessions.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Iku Rex" data-source="post: 2596110" data-attributes="member: 752">Of course. Sure, I suppose. I'm not quite sure what you mean by "gap" though. Is there a "gap" between a creature's two-weapon fighting and the end of his full attack action?Congratulations. You've discovered that the basic combat chapter in the PH doesn't contain explicit rules for every conceivable obscure situation. Let me see if I can get your interpretatons straight. Since no explicit rule says that secondary natural attacks can't occur anytime during the full attack action, that proves that you can mix in secondary natural attacks anywhere you like in your attack routine. For instance, a troll could go bite (-5),claw,claw or a lizardman fighter could go sword (-2 TWF), bite(-4 secondary multiattack), sword (-2 TWF). And since no explicit rule says that an attack made as part of a flurry of blows can occur anytime during the full attack action, that proves that you can't (couldn't?) mix in flurry of blows attacks anywhere you like in your attack routine. (For some reason the flurry will end as soon as you use a non-flurry attack after a flurry attack.) However, you can combine secondary natural attacks with two-weapon fighting because no explicit rule says that interjecting a natural attack between two-weapon fighting attacks in a full attack action will end the two-weapon fighting.That's nice. It's not very consistent though. :\Given that there is no explicit required order for a mix of flurry attacks and secondary natural attacks, how can you say that FoB must end if you perform a secondary natural attack in between flurry attacks?</blockquote>

Verification