Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Gryph" data-source="post: 5865090" data-attributes="member: 98071">Well, there is a seam available between knowing a small number per level like the 3.x sorceror and 30+ spells per level like the 3.x wizard.&nbsp;Expanding the number of spells knowable is equally within the DMs control. When it comes to managing the table conversation with my players, I would rather be in the position of making house rules that my players will see as generous, than house rules they will see as restrictive.&nbsp;So my preference is completely selfish.&nbsp;I also voted for limited the power of spells and of the two I think it's the more effective option. If lower level spells do not scale up with caster level or only scale up if you use a higher level spell slot when you memorize them, than I think a big portion of the high level caster problem disappears.&nbsp;I would like to note that I have always felt that sucking at low levels was a terrible way to balance high level caster power.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Gryph, post: 5865090, member: 98071"] Well, there is a seam available between knowing a small number per level like the 3.x sorceror and 30+ spells per level like the 3.x wizard. Expanding the number of spells knowable is equally within the DMs control. When it comes to managing the table conversation with my players, I would rather be in the position of making house rules that my players will see as generous, than house rules they will see as restrictive. So my preference is completely selfish. I also voted for limited the power of spells and of the two I think it's the more effective option. If lower level spells do not scale up with caster level or only scale up if you use a higher level spell slot when you memorize them, than I think a big portion of the high level caster problem disappears. I would like to note that I have always felt that sucking at low levels was a terrible way to balance high level caster power. [/QUOTE]

Verification