Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Throwing ideas, seeing what sticks (and what stinks)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AbdulAlhazred" data-source="post: 6963621" data-attributes="member: 82106"><p>Eh, now see, I'm not so sure I want to emulate d20/4e with it, not THAT closely. I'd rather see it as somewhat of a strategy game of its own. That is, what do you play and what do you hold onto? There might be an inducement for playing the 'lower value' cards. Maybe you simply get a specific mix of different values, depending on your level (etc). So the equivalent of an 'at-will' is a card you can have say 8 of in your deck, but it they have a modest effect/weight. </p><p></p><p>Another option is cards each have an inherent weight, but they they are offense/defense values. So you can play something that is heavily offensive, heavily defensive, kind of a mix, or etc. Maybe specific special cards have better values against certain other types of cards. Again, you could have 'kickers' and 'counters'. </p><p></p><p>I'd say that your deck has to last you the encounter, though maybe some cards are 'daily' and can't be shuffled back in until you get a long rest or something like that. OTOH I'm not sure you need that mechanism, a card that makes up 1 in 40 of a deck would be hard to rely on, and come up relatively rarely, but would still be a big signature move. Obviously you'd have to consider your cards to be more 'plot coupon' than indicators of some option you always have. You could play that up in card design too.</p><p></p><p>Maybe there could also be 'fortune' cards that would be a type of, or the main type of, kicker that you could drop, that might supply the function of the 'weight' card as you've described it. So you can build a character with few different moves, but a lot of fortune, or one with more moves and less fortune. </p><p></p><p>I could definitely see this kind of thing working well for say a 'swashbuckler' kind of game where PCs duel and do lots of crazy stunts and whatever, and the plot is heavily extemporized during play. Cards would let you pull stuff out of your hat. "No! I'm not run through by the Count's Blade, I play 4 fortune, he's disarmed and I flee!" Very much like other diceless systems that use some sort of currency for that kind of thing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AbdulAlhazred, post: 6963621, member: 82106"] Eh, now see, I'm not so sure I want to emulate d20/4e with it, not THAT closely. I'd rather see it as somewhat of a strategy game of its own. That is, what do you play and what do you hold onto? There might be an inducement for playing the 'lower value' cards. Maybe you simply get a specific mix of different values, depending on your level (etc). So the equivalent of an 'at-will' is a card you can have say 8 of in your deck, but it they have a modest effect/weight. Another option is cards each have an inherent weight, but they they are offense/defense values. So you can play something that is heavily offensive, heavily defensive, kind of a mix, or etc. Maybe specific special cards have better values against certain other types of cards. Again, you could have 'kickers' and 'counters'. I'd say that your deck has to last you the encounter, though maybe some cards are 'daily' and can't be shuffled back in until you get a long rest or something like that. OTOH I'm not sure you need that mechanism, a card that makes up 1 in 40 of a deck would be hard to rely on, and come up relatively rarely, but would still be a big signature move. Obviously you'd have to consider your cards to be more 'plot coupon' than indicators of some option you always have. You could play that up in card design too. Maybe there could also be 'fortune' cards that would be a type of, or the main type of, kicker that you could drop, that might supply the function of the 'weight' card as you've described it. So you can build a character with few different moves, but a lot of fortune, or one with more moves and less fortune. I could definitely see this kind of thing working well for say a 'swashbuckler' kind of game where PCs duel and do lots of crazy stunts and whatever, and the plot is heavily extemporized during play. Cards would let you pull stuff out of your hat. "No! I'm not run through by the Count's Blade, I play 4 fortune, he's disarmed and I flee!" Very much like other diceless systems that use some sort of currency for that kind of thing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Throwing ideas, seeing what sticks (and what stinks)
Top