Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Tiefling, Dragonborn : have they gained traction ?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="doctorhook" data-source="post: 4777755" data-attributes="member: 58401"><p>I quite like Dragonborn, but I'm willing to concede that their art direction needs refinement. I'm fine with the lack of tails and horns; what I mean is that I think they should be... sharper? They seem too round to me... I'm not totally sure what it is that bugs me about their look, but I'm sure it will evolve with time. (I might just be tired of Wayne England's odd looking faces...)</p><p></p><p>In comparison, I quite like the look of Tieflings, though I think they need clearer guidelines to their artists regarding tail size; they appear to vary wildly.</p><p></p><p>I suspect it's simply his true colours showing.</p><p></p><p>Here's what you said. (I'm quoting for my own reference.):[sblock=Originally posted by rounser]I don't think it's witty or clever, but I'll not give these contrived imposters the time of day by calling them by their poorly chosen name. They deserve mockery. Heck, I save to disbelieve that "they" exist as a core PC race in any D&D milieu worth a damn.[/sblock]Based upon this comment, it's pretty obvious to me that you hold either Dragonborns or 4E in irrational contempt. I say "irrational" because you offer no explanation. Worse, your comment is also a thinly veiled shot at 4E, implying that it isn't "worth a damn."</p><p></p><p>You seem to be suggesting that neither Dragonborns nor any other sort of anthropomorphic dragon have a place in the D&D core rules as a PC race, but you haven't made it clear why you think it would be best that way; obviously the notion of "dragon-people" is popular enough, so why should they be excluded?</p><p></p><p>Does it make a difference how long they've been a part of the game? In my opinion, it shouldn't; rather, inclusion ought to be (and AFAIK, is) determined by a combination of interesting possibilities and popular interest, both qualities which Dragonborn (or the "dragon-people" they represent) seem to have in spades.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="doctorhook, post: 4777755, member: 58401"] I quite like Dragonborn, but I'm willing to concede that their art direction needs refinement. I'm fine with the lack of tails and horns; what I mean is that I think they should be... sharper? They seem too round to me... I'm not totally sure what it is that bugs me about their look, but I'm sure it will evolve with time. (I might just be tired of Wayne England's odd looking faces...) In comparison, I quite like the look of Tieflings, though I think they need clearer guidelines to their artists regarding tail size; they appear to vary wildly. I suspect it's simply his true colours showing. Here's what you said. (I'm quoting for my own reference.):[sblock=Originally posted by rounser]I don't think it's witty or clever, but I'll not give these contrived imposters the time of day by calling them by their poorly chosen name. They deserve mockery. Heck, I save to disbelieve that "they" exist as a core PC race in any D&D milieu worth a damn.[/sblock]Based upon this comment, it's pretty obvious to me that you hold either Dragonborns or 4E in irrational contempt. I say "irrational" because you offer no explanation. Worse, your comment is also a thinly veiled shot at 4E, implying that it isn't "worth a damn." You seem to be suggesting that neither Dragonborns nor any other sort of anthropomorphic dragon have a place in the D&D core rules as a PC race, but you haven't made it clear why you think it would be best that way; obviously the notion of "dragon-people" is popular enough, so why should they be excluded? Does it make a difference how long they've been a part of the game? In my opinion, it shouldn't; rather, inclusion ought to be (and AFAIK, is) determined by a combination of interesting possibilities and popular interest, both qualities which Dragonborn (or the "dragon-people" they represent) seem to have in spades. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Tiefling, Dragonborn : have they gained traction ?
Top