Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="TheAuldGrump" data-source="post: 5704810" data-attributes="member: 6957">I prefer Pathfinder to M&amp;M, but I like Spycraft just as much as Pathfinder. (More of a genre thing in the case of M&amp;M - I think that the system is very elegant, but I don't play Supers much.)In honesty though&nbsp; - if 4e floats your boat, why try to inflict an arguable tier system on Pathfinder? Those who disagree will never agree with you, and the ones who do will argue about which class goes where. (Unless the argument is the point - in which case you can enjoy the bustle. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue&nbsp; &nbsp; :p"&nbsp; data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /> )When I read someone's post that talks about the lack of balance, or looking to create a more powerful character, I'm afraid my thoughts run along the lines of 'He/She is/has a lousy GM.' I certainly would not want to play in their game.The Auld Grump</blockquote>

[QUOTE="TheAuldGrump, post: 5704810, member: 6957"] I prefer Pathfinder to M&M, but I like Spycraft just as much as Pathfinder. (More of a genre thing in the case of M&M - I think that the system is very elegant, but I don't play Supers much.) In honesty though - if 4e floats your boat, why try to inflict an arguable tier system on Pathfinder? Those who disagree will never agree with you, and the ones who do will argue about which class goes where. (Unless the argument is the point - in which case you can enjoy the bustle. :p ) When I read someone's post that talks about the lack of balance, or looking to create a more powerful character, I'm afraid my thoughts run along the lines of 'He/She is/has a lousy GM.' I certainly would not want to play in their game. The Auld Grump [/QUOTE]

Verification