Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- individual adventure modules! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed to plug in to your game.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Time to Reflect on 3.5 Disappointments
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BryonD" data-source="post: 1176023" data-attributes="member: 957"><p>I agree that a lot of people agree with you. But your claims presume that WotC agrees with you. You called it a "pass off" as if this were accepted fact. That is FAR from true. When you make a statment that assumes an opinion to be generally accepted as fact, and that opinion is NOT generally accepted as fact, then your assumptions are faulty, and therefore your conclusions are faulty.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So? </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So you are saying that they are lying simply to support their income?</p><p></p><p>My point, that obviosuly went over your head, was that I believe that the people who developed 3.5 think it is good on its own merits. The anti-corpation, anti-profit knee-jerks continue to reject this as even conceivable. As you have just done again by demading that profit is the only true basis of agreeing with me.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This has been disputed. You, conviently disregard the replies. Again, you simply choose to believe what you want. That is fine. But then you go around and start slamming people on the presumption that you opinion stands for fact.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Nope. You made one demonstrably wrong statement. You insist that other people motives MUST be driven by your views. In order for them to be "passing off" 3.5, then they MUST agree with you. So when you make that statement as a fact, you wrongly deny the possibilty that they honestly disagree with you.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If you see hypocrisy then you don't get the difference. </p><p></p><p>I never criticized your opinion. I criticized your demand that other people's actions assume they agree with your opinion.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>OK, fine. Your opinion is a piece of the market. If the overall market agreed with you, the 3.5 would have flopped. It has not. </p><p></p><p>I object to terms like "pass off" and "money grab". These reek of typical anti free market sour grapes attacks.</p><p></p><p>Nobody spanked you.</p><p>It was volunatary.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BryonD, post: 1176023, member: 957"] I agree that a lot of people agree with you. But your claims presume that WotC agrees with you. You called it a "pass off" as if this were accepted fact. That is FAR from true. When you make a statment that assumes an opinion to be generally accepted as fact, and that opinion is NOT generally accepted as fact, then your assumptions are faulty, and therefore your conclusions are faulty. So? So you are saying that they are lying simply to support their income? My point, that obviosuly went over your head, was that I believe that the people who developed 3.5 think it is good on its own merits. The anti-corpation, anti-profit knee-jerks continue to reject this as even conceivable. As you have just done again by demading that profit is the only true basis of agreeing with me. This has been disputed. You, conviently disregard the replies. Again, you simply choose to believe what you want. That is fine. But then you go around and start slamming people on the presumption that you opinion stands for fact. Nope. You made one demonstrably wrong statement. You insist that other people motives MUST be driven by your views. In order for them to be "passing off" 3.5, then they MUST agree with you. So when you make that statement as a fact, you wrongly deny the possibilty that they honestly disagree with you. If you see hypocrisy then you don't get the difference. I never criticized your opinion. I criticized your demand that other people's actions assume they agree with your opinion. OK, fine. Your opinion is a piece of the market. If the overall market agreed with you, the 3.5 would have flopped. It has not. I object to terms like "pass off" and "money grab". These reek of typical anti free market sour grapes attacks. Nobody spanked you. It was volunatary. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Time to Reflect on 3.5 Disappointments
Top