Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Timeline advancement vs. Reimagining
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kae'Yoss" data-source="post: 3793626" data-attributes="member: 4134"><p>They should leave the Realms alone. I don't mean the rules stuff - I have no problem with them changing the rules stuff to fit the new edition of the rules - but the Realms themselves should not be changed just because it's a new edition.</p><p></p><p>I'm okay with Charakter X now being a Wizard/Fighter instead of a Wizard/Fighter/Bladesinger or something, but it should still be the Character X we know. </p><p></p><p>I don't want them to suddenly say "In the New Forgotten Realms, there never was a goddess of Magic, no Netheril, no gnomes, and Waterdeep is just a small hamlet near the Sea of Axes.</p><p></p><p>Of course, I also don't want them making a Divine Soap Opera and FUBAR the setting, like they seem intent to.</p><p></p><p>It might mean that some people will not start playing in the FR because they don't like it, but that's as it should be: If they don't like the setting, they should go for a different setting.</p><p></p><p>But this BS about peeving those who like the Realms like they were just to get new people is a really bad move.</p><p></p><p>I don't want Forgotten Realms: The Beginning, or Forgotten Realms: The Requiem, I don't want them to sell us a spin-off as the genuine article. Go make a new setting for those who don't like the Realms, but don't peeve existing customers just to get some new ones.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kae'Yoss, post: 3793626, member: 4134"] They should leave the Realms alone. I don't mean the rules stuff - I have no problem with them changing the rules stuff to fit the new edition of the rules - but the Realms themselves should not be changed just because it's a new edition. I'm okay with Charakter X now being a Wizard/Fighter instead of a Wizard/Fighter/Bladesinger or something, but it should still be the Character X we know. I don't want them to suddenly say "In the New Forgotten Realms, there never was a goddess of Magic, no Netheril, no gnomes, and Waterdeep is just a small hamlet near the Sea of Axes. Of course, I also don't want them making a Divine Soap Opera and FUBAR the setting, like they seem intent to. It might mean that some people will not start playing in the FR because they don't like it, but that's as it should be: If they don't like the setting, they should go for a different setting. But this BS about peeving those who like the Realms like they were just to get new people is a really bad move. I don't want Forgotten Realms: The Beginning, or Forgotten Realms: The Requiem, I don't want them to sell us a spin-off as the genuine article. Go make a new setting for those who don't like the Realms, but don't peeve existing customers just to get some new ones. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Timeline advancement vs. Reimagining
Top