Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Tips For Running The New Giants Adventures
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ferghis" data-source="post: 5990073" data-attributes="member: 40483"><p>The MM3 was published in June 2010, way before Chris Perkins finished working on G1-3, so the math SHOULD be updated. I would check the individual encounters. I've never played or read it myself, but I've heard that they can be a bit unbalanced (both too easy and too hard). So I can't tell you much at all about the adventures, which is probably what you're more interested in. But I can tell you something about the characters.</p><p></p><p>The party is light on control, but that's fine in my book, especially if most of the party is melee capable, which it appears to be. Also, there's six of them, so that should make it easier to deal with "too many enemies." Maybe go light on the minions, if you feel like it. </p><p></p><p>Make sure the player with the hybrid knows what they are doing: hybrids are easy to mess up, if you haven't planned out a good deal of the character's development to make sure it's up to par. For starters, Hybrid Talent is essentially another feat tax for hybrids: I've never seen a good hybrid build that didn't take that feat. Int/Wis synergize work well for stalker shaman and control wizard, but that's where I see the synergy ending: the character may do two jobs poorly (but I've often been wrong about hybrids). Plus, with (I imagine) poor AC and Fort, that spirit companion is going to die regularly (not that anyone will miss it, since it grants no real benefits). Spirit Companions were also built to work with the old math, so, if you're inclined, give it a few more HP. Shamans are also something of a skillmonkey, a job the Bard should be doing much better. So, my concern is, the player might be frustrated by an underperforming character. If you think the player is fine with that, then don't worry about it.</p><p></p><p>EDIT: would the player consider rebuilding the hybrid as a straight shaman with the Bardic Ritualist or the Divine Secretkeeper feats for access to rituals? The latter also opens up a fantastic invoker paragon path for leaders: Flame of Hope.</p><p></p><p>If the players have never played their characters before, put them through a couple of straightforward fights before launching into the adventure, just to give them an idea of how their characters can work together.</p><p></p><p>The shifter rogue should consider going ranger and refluffing it as a rogue, but that's probably just me overoptimizing. </p><p></p><p>Remind the players that dragonmark feats are available (unless they aren't), and they'd be idiots not to take them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ferghis, post: 5990073, member: 40483"] The MM3 was published in June 2010, way before Chris Perkins finished working on G1-3, so the math SHOULD be updated. I would check the individual encounters. I've never played or read it myself, but I've heard that they can be a bit unbalanced (both too easy and too hard). So I can't tell you much at all about the adventures, which is probably what you're more interested in. But I can tell you something about the characters. The party is light on control, but that's fine in my book, especially if most of the party is melee capable, which it appears to be. Also, there's six of them, so that should make it easier to deal with "too many enemies." Maybe go light on the minions, if you feel like it. Make sure the player with the hybrid knows what they are doing: hybrids are easy to mess up, if you haven't planned out a good deal of the character's development to make sure it's up to par. For starters, Hybrid Talent is essentially another feat tax for hybrids: I've never seen a good hybrid build that didn't take that feat. Int/Wis synergize work well for stalker shaman and control wizard, but that's where I see the synergy ending: the character may do two jobs poorly (but I've often been wrong about hybrids). Plus, with (I imagine) poor AC and Fort, that spirit companion is going to die regularly (not that anyone will miss it, since it grants no real benefits). Spirit Companions were also built to work with the old math, so, if you're inclined, give it a few more HP. Shamans are also something of a skillmonkey, a job the Bard should be doing much better. So, my concern is, the player might be frustrated by an underperforming character. If you think the player is fine with that, then don't worry about it. EDIT: would the player consider rebuilding the hybrid as a straight shaman with the Bardic Ritualist or the Divine Secretkeeper feats for access to rituals? The latter also opens up a fantastic invoker paragon path for leaders: Flame of Hope. If the players have never played their characters before, put them through a couple of straightforward fights before launching into the adventure, just to give them an idea of how their characters can work together. The shifter rogue should consider going ranger and refluffing it as a rogue, but that's probably just me overoptimizing. Remind the players that dragonmark feats are available (unless they aren't), and they'd be idiots not to take them. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Tips For Running The New Giants Adventures
Top