Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Titan Mauler and Large Weapons
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jester David" data-source="post: 6169770" data-attributes="member: 37579"><p>The odds of rolling any given number are the same but when making two attacks you have a higher chance of one being a hit rather than none. </p><p>I've done some Excel spreadsheets in my time where you can generate a few thousand die rolls, and rolling twice does help. </p><p> </p><p></p><p>Okay, let's break it down. </p><p></p><p>A TWF armed with two shortswords does two attacks dealing 1d6. TWF tends to be a high Dex (which doesn't help their damage) Assuming you need a 12 to hit normally this becomes a 14 with TWF so you have a 35% chance of hitting. Average damage is 3.85 (2[5.5*.35]). Rangers are an exception but we'll work around a fighter for all the examples. Weapon specialization makes this 5.25. </p><p>A sword-n-board might be doing 1d8+4 but have a 45% chance of hitting which works out to 3.825 average damage, but higher AC. And a greatsword does 2d6+4 for 5.85 average damage. With Weapon Specialization this is 4.725 and 6.75. Adding power attack to the mix changes the damage to 5 and 7.2. </p><p></p><p>However, this is only half the story. 2h and SnB the attacks are all-or-nothing. They have the straight 40-45% chance of hitting and dealing damage. The TWF, even with the reduced 35% chance per attack has an effective 57.75% chance of landing <em>A</em> hit. Some damage is better than no damage. </p><p></p><p>So TWF is slightly higher damage that sword-n-board, especially with weapon spec, but less that a giant two-hander. But you take SnB for defence and a higher AC, although a single feat gets a TWF some defence. </p><p></p><p>Let's also do level 6, when iteratives come into play. AC doesn't increase at the same rate as BAB so accuracy often goes up. So the SnB & 2h fighter hits on a 12 and a 17 with Power Attack, and the TWF on a 12 and 17. We'll also give the 2h Furious Focus to really make things extreme, so the 2h hits on a 10 and 17. </p><p>SnB does an average of 6.3 and 2.8 for a total of 9.1. The 2h does and average of 11.55 on the first strike and 4.2 on the second for a total of 15.75. The TWF can make four attacks dealing 3.375, 3.375, 1.5, and 1.5 for a total of 9.75. </p><p></p><p>So TWF continues to hold even with one handed weapons on average expected damage. Which seems pretty balanced. </p><p></p><p>But this also isn't going ranger, which might have higher Strength or rogue that would add Sneak Attack to the mix.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jester David, post: 6169770, member: 37579"] The odds of rolling any given number are the same but when making two attacks you have a higher chance of one being a hit rather than none. I've done some Excel spreadsheets in my time where you can generate a few thousand die rolls, and rolling twice does help. Okay, let's break it down. A TWF armed with two shortswords does two attacks dealing 1d6. TWF tends to be a high Dex (which doesn't help their damage) Assuming you need a 12 to hit normally this becomes a 14 with TWF so you have a 35% chance of hitting. Average damage is 3.85 (2[5.5*.35]). Rangers are an exception but we'll work around a fighter for all the examples. Weapon specialization makes this 5.25. A sword-n-board might be doing 1d8+4 but have a 45% chance of hitting which works out to 3.825 average damage, but higher AC. And a greatsword does 2d6+4 for 5.85 average damage. With Weapon Specialization this is 4.725 and 6.75. Adding power attack to the mix changes the damage to 5 and 7.2. However, this is only half the story. 2h and SnB the attacks are all-or-nothing. They have the straight 40-45% chance of hitting and dealing damage. The TWF, even with the reduced 35% chance per attack has an effective 57.75% chance of landing [I]A[/I] hit. Some damage is better than no damage. So TWF is slightly higher damage that sword-n-board, especially with weapon spec, but less that a giant two-hander. But you take SnB for defence and a higher AC, although a single feat gets a TWF some defence. Let's also do level 6, when iteratives come into play. AC doesn't increase at the same rate as BAB so accuracy often goes up. So the SnB & 2h fighter hits on a 12 and a 17 with Power Attack, and the TWF on a 12 and 17. We'll also give the 2h Furious Focus to really make things extreme, so the 2h hits on a 10 and 17. SnB does an average of 6.3 and 2.8 for a total of 9.1. The 2h does and average of 11.55 on the first strike and 4.2 on the second for a total of 15.75. The TWF can make four attacks dealing 3.375, 3.375, 1.5, and 1.5 for a total of 9.75. So TWF continues to hold even with one handed weapons on average expected damage. Which seems pretty balanced. But this also isn't going ranger, which might have higher Strength or rogue that would add Sneak Attack to the mix. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Titan Mauler and Large Weapons
Top