Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Ashrem Bayle" data-source="post: 4153913" data-attributes="member: 3103">Ok, We'll take it step by step then.Precisly my point.No. And it's not the point I'm trying to make.How is this relevant? I understand how the attack can fail.YepYepThat level of lethality is exactly what I want. I want to PCs to know that one lucky shot from kobold #2 could mean death.Because it can happen in real life.He's not a rules expert. He was making decisions based off of how things work in the real world instead of using D&D-logic.Thus, my whole reason for wanting a system that isn't D&D and depends more on real world logic.No. The DM wasn't happy either. The problem was that a scenerio that could happen in the real world was not possible in the game. He attempted to sneak up and kill the guard in one blow. This is possible in the real world. It was impossible in the game. No matter what he rolled, it could not have happened.D&D is less realistic than other games. They all have some level, true, but D&D is way at the other end of the scale.Again, the DM himself wasn't happy with the situation. It wasn't a situation of DM vs. Players, but real world logic vs. D&D rules.</blockquote>