Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
To cast, you need Catalyst. Implementation?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="curiosity" data-source="post: 1701215" data-attributes="member: 22000"><p>In my brewing campaign world, arcane magic will be impossible without the assistance of a powdered metal, called Catalyst (imaginative, no? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue :p" data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /> ). This substance will be mined in a specific area of the campaign world, and control over the the mining and distribution of Catalyst will be a hot issue (think Dune/'spice').</p><p></p><p>I like this concept fluff-wise, and I think it helps to explain a magic-rich society (which I want) where there still isn't a heavy reliance on magic (because no-one wants to waste precious Catalyst). I also want to make getting enough Catalyst a bit of a challenge for PC mages.</p><p></p><p>So the question is how best to implement this rules-wise. At the least extreme end, I could just ban Sorcs, and say that any spell with an M component requires a pinch of Catalyst per spell level.</p><p></p><p>At the most extreme end, I could toss the entire Vancian magic system for one based just on character level and Catalyst. Probably too difficult to balance something like this though.</p><p></p><p>In the middle, I could say that all spells require their spell level in pinches of Catalyst to work (so 0th level are free). Simple but effective. But then I am still tempted to mash Wiz and Sorc together to form just one class, I think because I want to integrate Catalyst more closely into spellcasting - tie it to learning/memorising as well...</p><p></p><p>Now, to make this not a total bummer for mages, I figured that they would be able to choose to burn <i>more</i> catalyst than needed in order to get some benefit - perhaps in order to heighten spell level, like the feat (mimicking metamagic feats in general might be the way to go). But maybe there would be some risk associated with this (a la wild magic).</p><p></p><p>Incidentally, Catalyst will be a necessary part of creating magic items as well. However, I was thinking that because Catalyst is present in low amounts almost everywhere, it would be possible for mundane items to 'spontaneously enchant' in suitably heroic circumstances - I really like this idea, saw it in a feat here: <a href="http://juergen.the-huberts.net/dnd/urbis/feats.html" target="_blank">http://juergen.the-huberts.net/dnd/urbis/feats.html</a></p><p></p><p>I HUMBLY REQUEST COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS ON MY IDEAS. </p><p></p><p>Thanks!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="curiosity, post: 1701215, member: 22000"] In my brewing campaign world, arcane magic will be impossible without the assistance of a powdered metal, called Catalyst (imaginative, no? :p ). This substance will be mined in a specific area of the campaign world, and control over the the mining and distribution of Catalyst will be a hot issue (think Dune/'spice'). I like this concept fluff-wise, and I think it helps to explain a magic-rich society (which I want) where there still isn't a heavy reliance on magic (because no-one wants to waste precious Catalyst). I also want to make getting enough Catalyst a bit of a challenge for PC mages. So the question is how best to implement this rules-wise. At the least extreme end, I could just ban Sorcs, and say that any spell with an M component requires a pinch of Catalyst per spell level. At the most extreme end, I could toss the entire Vancian magic system for one based just on character level and Catalyst. Probably too difficult to balance something like this though. In the middle, I could say that all spells require their spell level in pinches of Catalyst to work (so 0th level are free). Simple but effective. But then I am still tempted to mash Wiz and Sorc together to form just one class, I think because I want to integrate Catalyst more closely into spellcasting - tie it to learning/memorising as well... Now, to make this not a total bummer for mages, I figured that they would be able to choose to burn <i>more</i> catalyst than needed in order to get some benefit - perhaps in order to heighten spell level, like the feat (mimicking metamagic feats in general might be the way to go). But maybe there would be some risk associated with this (a la wild magic). Incidentally, Catalyst will be a necessary part of creating magic items as well. However, I was thinking that because Catalyst is present in low amounts almost everywhere, it would be possible for mundane items to 'spontaneously enchant' in suitably heroic circumstances - I really like this idea, saw it in a feat here: [url]http://juergen.the-huberts.net/dnd/urbis/feats.html[/url] I HUMBLY REQUEST COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS ON MY IDEAS. Thanks! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
To cast, you need Catalyst. Implementation?
Top