Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
To fudge or not to fudge: that is the question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Maxperson" data-source="post: 6786977" data-attributes="member: 23751"><p>Not entirely true. If you make a bad decision in tactics, I won't fudge a thing.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Fair enough. I house rule the game to make it better. Some people like to follow the rules exactly. I don't like games that follow RAW and refuse to deviate, either. Fortunately, it's easy to find people with like views so we can both be happy <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You're choosing to believe someone who has exhibited extreme confirmation bias. He has great bias against fudging and has blatantly picked math that doesn't have anything to do with what we are discussing here in order to confirm his bias......and yours.</p><p></p><p>He chose multiple 20's in a row. Something nobody here requires or needs for the situation in order to artificially increase the odds. Then he added in more extreme missing than is required. Again to artificially increase the odds. Then he picked some campaign of non-existence where for some reason there are only ever 2 creatures in an encounter. Yet again, to artificially increase the odds. You're doing exactly what you said your friends did. You are looking at numbers and not seeing the truth due to your own bias. His numbers are less accurate than 1+1=2.</p><p></p><p>You shouldn't be talking to me about confirmation bias when you yourself clearly can't get past it right here in this thread.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Unlike Ezekial, I'm not going to invent fictional numbers in order to try and support my side of things. I don't know exactly how many encounters I have over a campaign. It varies. I don't know exactly how many creatures in total they encounter. It varies, but I can say that it is very, very frequently more than 2. How many attacks is that? Heck if I know, but most monsters have more than 1 attack unless we're talking lots of orcs or something. My campaigns go level 1-20, so there are a lot of mid to high level multi-attack monsters out there.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Your confirmation bias is showing. You should cover it up <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Maxperson, post: 6786977, member: 23751"] Not entirely true. If you make a bad decision in tactics, I won't fudge a thing. Fair enough. I house rule the game to make it better. Some people like to follow the rules exactly. I don't like games that follow RAW and refuse to deviate, either. Fortunately, it's easy to find people with like views so we can both be happy :) You're choosing to believe someone who has exhibited extreme confirmation bias. He has great bias against fudging and has blatantly picked math that doesn't have anything to do with what we are discussing here in order to confirm his bias......and yours. He chose multiple 20's in a row. Something nobody here requires or needs for the situation in order to artificially increase the odds. Then he added in more extreme missing than is required. Again to artificially increase the odds. Then he picked some campaign of non-existence where for some reason there are only ever 2 creatures in an encounter. Yet again, to artificially increase the odds. You're doing exactly what you said your friends did. You are looking at numbers and not seeing the truth due to your own bias. His numbers are less accurate than 1+1=2. You shouldn't be talking to me about confirmation bias when you yourself clearly can't get past it right here in this thread. Unlike Ezekial, I'm not going to invent fictional numbers in order to try and support my side of things. I don't know exactly how many encounters I have over a campaign. It varies. I don't know exactly how many creatures in total they encounter. It varies, but I can say that it is very, very frequently more than 2. How many attacks is that? Heck if I know, but most monsters have more than 1 attack unless we're talking lots of orcs or something. My campaigns go level 1-20, so there are a lot of mid to high level multi-attack monsters out there. Your confirmation bias is showing. You should cover it up ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
To fudge or not to fudge: that is the question
Top