Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
To Kill or Not to Kill (PCs): That is the Question...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Argyle King" data-source="post: 5947865" data-attributes="member: 58416"><p>For me personally, I prefer all parts of the campaign to be exciting/climactic/insert-choice-of-word-here. I agree that some fights are (as far as a story arc and consequences are concerned) more heavily weighted with importance. However, I do not like the idea that the rest of the campaign -when you're not interacting with the BBEG- is viewed as unimportant. </p><p></p><p>For me personally, I think those small battles and small scenes are important. They are important because they are part of the story which has been created by the players. If the players decide to take interest in a certain aspect of the game, I do not feel it is my place as DM to push them back onto a road toward what I -as an out of game entity- feels they should be doing. </p><p></p><p>None of this is meant to suggest I never nudge the game in a certain direction. However, nudging is not fudging. What I meant by giving a nudge is that I might plant a plot seed. Though, in recent years, I'd say I've even gotten away from that somewhat. I view my role as DM as an out-of-game entity; as such, I prefer that the NPCs, BBEGs, and other moving pieces of the game world to act in a manner which is natural. From those natural movements, I believe plots will naturally grow.</p><p></p><p>The movements of the player pieces (their characters) will (I believe) also have a hand in how the world and the story is shaped. Sometimes these movements will cross paths with the movements of other pieces. However, it's also perfectly fine if some pieces don't cross each other. I prefer for the world to not remain static when the players are not around. </p><p></p><p>How this relates to the topic is I'm saying that I do not necessarily believe some encounters are more important than others. From an in-game perspective, some 'pieces' may be more important than others. As far as what's important from an out-of-game perspective, that's something that I prefer to emerge from playing the game. As such, I strongly prefer to not use my power as DM (again, an out-of-game entity in my view) to artificially impact the natural progression of the in-game world more than necessary. As such; as said, I do not feel a need to fudge* through a fight with minions; whether or not that encounter is important isn't entirely up to me. </p><p></p><p>I feel your way is perfectly fine; if it makes you and your group happy, that is what is important. My views are simply different. </p><p></p><p></p><p>*I have done something similar, but I'm not sure that I'd call it fudging because I did it out in the open. Long story short: the players were obviously going to win a combat, but we ran out of time to complete it during a session. At the next session, we could not remember exactly where we were in initiative and other such details. So, as DM, I allowed the players to decide what happened in a very narrative way. I went to each player around the table and told them to describe one thing; then the next player did the same, and so on. Occasionally, I would call for a die roll (for example, one player described that a hover bike had exploded, so I had some of the nearby players make a roll to avoid damage.) </p><p></p><p>I felt it was a fun way to get the story moving forward, and the players enjoyed it. If I were going to fudge, I'd prefer to do it out in the open like that and allow the players to participate rather than doing it behind a curtain (DM screen.) I strongly prefer an honest relationship with the players at the table, and I also felt it was more fun to allow the players to be creative rather than have them slog through a fight using die rolls which had little or no meaning.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Argyle King, post: 5947865, member: 58416"] For me personally, I prefer all parts of the campaign to be exciting/climactic/insert-choice-of-word-here. I agree that some fights are (as far as a story arc and consequences are concerned) more heavily weighted with importance. However, I do not like the idea that the rest of the campaign -when you're not interacting with the BBEG- is viewed as unimportant. For me personally, I think those small battles and small scenes are important. They are important because they are part of the story which has been created by the players. If the players decide to take interest in a certain aspect of the game, I do not feel it is my place as DM to push them back onto a road toward what I -as an out of game entity- feels they should be doing. None of this is meant to suggest I never nudge the game in a certain direction. However, nudging is not fudging. What I meant by giving a nudge is that I might plant a plot seed. Though, in recent years, I'd say I've even gotten away from that somewhat. I view my role as DM as an out-of-game entity; as such, I prefer that the NPCs, BBEGs, and other moving pieces of the game world to act in a manner which is natural. From those natural movements, I believe plots will naturally grow. The movements of the player pieces (their characters) will (I believe) also have a hand in how the world and the story is shaped. Sometimes these movements will cross paths with the movements of other pieces. However, it's also perfectly fine if some pieces don't cross each other. I prefer for the world to not remain static when the players are not around. How this relates to the topic is I'm saying that I do not necessarily believe some encounters are more important than others. From an in-game perspective, some 'pieces' may be more important than others. As far as what's important from an out-of-game perspective, that's something that I prefer to emerge from playing the game. As such, I strongly prefer to not use my power as DM (again, an out-of-game entity in my view) to artificially impact the natural progression of the in-game world more than necessary. As such; as said, I do not feel a need to fudge* through a fight with minions; whether or not that encounter is important isn't entirely up to me. I feel your way is perfectly fine; if it makes you and your group happy, that is what is important. My views are simply different. *I have done something similar, but I'm not sure that I'd call it fudging because I did it out in the open. Long story short: the players were obviously going to win a combat, but we ran out of time to complete it during a session. At the next session, we could not remember exactly where we were in initiative and other such details. So, as DM, I allowed the players to decide what happened in a very narrative way. I went to each player around the table and told them to describe one thing; then the next player did the same, and so on. Occasionally, I would call for a die roll (for example, one player described that a hover bike had exploded, so I had some of the nearby players make a roll to avoid damage.) I felt it was a fun way to get the story moving forward, and the players enjoyed it. If I were going to fudge, I'd prefer to do it out in the open like that and allow the players to participate rather than doing it behind a curtain (DM screen.) I strongly prefer an honest relationship with the players at the table, and I also felt it was more fun to allow the players to be creative rather than have them slog through a fight using die rolls which had little or no meaning. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
To Kill or Not to Kill (PCs): That is the Question...
Top