Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="UngeheuerLich" data-source="post: 5276681" data-attributes="member: 59057">It is still an ok choice to take melee training... I just don´t get why it is so terrible...Maybe the solution is easy:Tensers TransformationWizard UtilitydailyTransmutationuntil the end of the encounter, you use your int modifier for basic melee attacks. On a hit, you deal an extra 1d6 damage and push the target con modifier squares and deal con damage to an enemy adjacent to the target. you cannot only use at-will powers until you end this power as a minor action.something like that...I have te feeling that melee training is either too good, or not good enough. If you are a wizard, wven if you trained melee training, it is still not good enough as a regular attack. As an opportunity attack or charge attack or granted attack by a power, it is so strong, that not to take melee training is a mistake.So nerfing this feat is the right decision, but maybe we need a reconstruction of MBAsActually I would have been fine if MBA and RBA was:attack: highes attribute vs ACdamage 1[w] + str (melee) / dex (ranged)So you can take melee training if your strength is too low. But with mediocre strength you can live without the feat. Maybe different classes could get a feat that allows other effects on MBAs other than added damage (like a mage getting a push effect on a hit)</blockquote>