Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
To Mike Mearls: Melee training and the Battlemind
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mengu" data-source="post: 5283801" data-attributes="member: 65726"><p>It's about as powerful as being a Strength based character such as a barbarian, and they're not forced to spend extra points on intelligence to have a good basic attack. An Avenger who wants primarily wisdom and intelligence or dexterity, and a little bit of Con since he will be in melee a lot, has no use (or points left over) for strength. Why is it too powerful for him to have a basic attack as good as a barbarian? They both play similar roles, barbarian just happens to have a strength stat as primary.</p><p></p><p>Basic attack is about the worst attack a character has anyway. That's why it's basic. Your encounter powers, daily powers, and at-will powers will all be better than this. It just gives you a competent attack in certain situations. Why is this too powerful?</p><p></p><p>As an avenger player with melee training, I'm unhappy with the change. I lose 3 points of damage, and that might not seem like a lot, but it's 20% of my damage on a hit, considering how often I end up having to charge to get to a target, and how often I get granted basic attacks, it's a pretty hefty penalty, and makes strength based strikers such as barbarian or ranger simply more desirable.</p><p></p><p>It was a tool that allowed non-strength based characters to jump over a hurdle they shouldn't have had to overcome to begin with. Now it's a half-baked tool that leaves me dissatisfied.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mengu, post: 5283801, member: 65726"] It's about as powerful as being a Strength based character such as a barbarian, and they're not forced to spend extra points on intelligence to have a good basic attack. An Avenger who wants primarily wisdom and intelligence or dexterity, and a little bit of Con since he will be in melee a lot, has no use (or points left over) for strength. Why is it too powerful for him to have a basic attack as good as a barbarian? They both play similar roles, barbarian just happens to have a strength stat as primary. Basic attack is about the worst attack a character has anyway. That's why it's basic. Your encounter powers, daily powers, and at-will powers will all be better than this. It just gives you a competent attack in certain situations. Why is this too powerful? As an avenger player with melee training, I'm unhappy with the change. I lose 3 points of damage, and that might not seem like a lot, but it's 20% of my damage on a hit, considering how often I end up having to charge to get to a target, and how often I get granted basic attacks, it's a pretty hefty penalty, and makes strength based strikers such as barbarian or ranger simply more desirable. It was a tool that allowed non-strength based characters to jump over a hurdle they shouldn't have had to overcome to begin with. Now it's a half-baked tool that leaves me dissatisfied. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
To Mike Mearls: Melee training and the Battlemind
Top