Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
To Mike Mearls: Melee training and the Battlemind
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Saeviomagy" data-source="post: 5284733" data-attributes="member: 5890"><p>The strength based builds have no issues getting CA at range. I don't understand why you think they do. Their toolbox for gaining CA is pretty much identical with the exception of the int-based build's super-stealth.</p><p></p><p>I really don't know where you're going here.</p><p></p><p>Avenger stands next to foe. Foe double moves away. Avenger gains OA (which sucks because his MBA sucks), moves, then charges (which also sucks, because his MBA sucks).</p><p></p><p>l2adhominem!</p><p></p><p>The nerf? Well, some parties are going to lose a not-insignificant amount of damage, but it's not the nerf that's an issue in my mind: it's that the nerf is being developed to counter a feat developed to counter an issue with roughly half the melee classes.</p><p></p><p>Doesn't do as much damage as what? As of right now, most strikers aren't able to get their damage boosts on granted basic attacks. If it weren't for the fact that any melee class with strength is automatically better with granted attacks than any melee class without it, then it would be a roughly even field. Right now: give it to the guy with strength, regardless of his role or weapon.</p><p></p><p>The effect of melee training for a monk or assassin is:</p><p>1. OAs. They do matter. If your foes know your OA is unlikely to hit, and will do rubbish damage even if it does, then they are much more likely to move away from you.</p><p>2. Charges. An at-will that basically says "move your speed and attack with +1 to hit" is pretty good when you get it for free. Missing out on it will make a difference (for starters, reference what I said about foes being able to simply double move away from you with little risk)</p><p>3. Granted attacks. The striker role is supposed to be about dealing damage. So why is the fighter the prime choice for granted attacks over every other class in the game?</p><p></p><p>If you think that OAs, maneuverability and the ability to have your powers work when you choose a warlord are minor issues, then please, feel free to leave this discussion. It's obvious that you believe that the impact of melee training is slight, and that if anything it's a terrible feat for anyone to choose. In which case, why do you feel the need to argue that it needs to be worse/removed from the game?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Saeviomagy, post: 5284733, member: 5890"] The strength based builds have no issues getting CA at range. I don't understand why you think they do. Their toolbox for gaining CA is pretty much identical with the exception of the int-based build's super-stealth. I really don't know where you're going here. Avenger stands next to foe. Foe double moves away. Avenger gains OA (which sucks because his MBA sucks), moves, then charges (which also sucks, because his MBA sucks). l2adhominem! The nerf? Well, some parties are going to lose a not-insignificant amount of damage, but it's not the nerf that's an issue in my mind: it's that the nerf is being developed to counter a feat developed to counter an issue with roughly half the melee classes. Doesn't do as much damage as what? As of right now, most strikers aren't able to get their damage boosts on granted basic attacks. If it weren't for the fact that any melee class with strength is automatically better with granted attacks than any melee class without it, then it would be a roughly even field. Right now: give it to the guy with strength, regardless of his role or weapon. The effect of melee training for a monk or assassin is: 1. OAs. They do matter. If your foes know your OA is unlikely to hit, and will do rubbish damage even if it does, then they are much more likely to move away from you. 2. Charges. An at-will that basically says "move your speed and attack with +1 to hit" is pretty good when you get it for free. Missing out on it will make a difference (for starters, reference what I said about foes being able to simply double move away from you with little risk) 3. Granted attacks. The striker role is supposed to be about dealing damage. So why is the fighter the prime choice for granted attacks over every other class in the game? If you think that OAs, maneuverability and the ability to have your powers work when you choose a warlord are minor issues, then please, feel free to leave this discussion. It's obvious that you believe that the impact of melee training is slight, and that if anything it's a terrible feat for anyone to choose. In which case, why do you feel the need to argue that it needs to be worse/removed from the game? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
To Mike Mearls: Melee training and the Battlemind
Top