Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
To Prep or Not to Prep - A Players Perspective
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TheSword" data-source="post: 9466496" data-attributes="member: 6879661"><p>A poll here spun off from the Who buys Modules thread.</p><p></p><p>I’m interested to know what expectations players have of their DMs. Rather than what DMs think they should have to do (or not have to do)</p><p></p><p>For reference the four grading are</p><p></p><p><strong>Extensive detail</strong> - the level described in a very detailed campaign/module or a regular module where the DM has gone through - tailored to their party and filled gaps. There is little randomness or what is has been curated to specific encounter tables for that location and the majority of encounters are detailed. Maps are mapped, NPCs are fully realised and detailed. They have agendas and events will transpire unless PCs intervene. Clues and foreshadowing are liberally spread throughout. Players will have to give warning at least a session in advance of their intended next course if it isn’t clear and will need to cleave pretty closely to the prepared campaign area.</p><p></p><p><strong>Salient detail</strong> - The level of details as found in a typical 5e/Paizo campaign/module. Areas are detailed but there are gaps. There are potential encounters and events detailed. Many NPCs and foes will be stat block only or refer to a stat block and further details are left for the DM to improvise. Same for location details. Future events are planned out assuming NPCs are free to enact them. Some of these events are foreshadowed and some clues can be found. Players can go off in unexpected directions but it will likely require a session or two foreword thinking.</p><p></p><p><strong>Minimal detail -</strong> The level of certain rare sparse modules. Where little more is provided than an outline, some headlines of an encounter and a rough idea of what foes and NPCs will be found. Descriptions of locations are likely to be an overview. Most NPC/foe details will be winged on the fly. As will treasure. Players can go in most sane directions without notice and the DM will likely have a enough to fill a session. There is likely to be little forward thinking of events and relatively few clues. There may be quite a lot of procedurally generated information to fill the gaps.</p><p></p><p><strong>No detail</strong> - the game is entirely dependent on what the players want to do. The world is your oyster but it will all be made up as you go. Encounter charts out of the PHB/DMG.</p><p></p><p>If there are other grades I’ve missed off - spread the word.</p><p></p><p>I’ve deliberated put General D&D so this doesn’t get derailed by games systems that are purely improvisational and have that as their central theme. They’re not relevant here.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TheSword, post: 9466496, member: 6879661"] A poll here spun off from the Who buys Modules thread. I’m interested to know what expectations players have of their DMs. Rather than what DMs think they should have to do (or not have to do) For reference the four grading are [B]Extensive detail[/B] - the level described in a very detailed campaign/module or a regular module where the DM has gone through - tailored to their party and filled gaps. There is little randomness or what is has been curated to specific encounter tables for that location and the majority of encounters are detailed. Maps are mapped, NPCs are fully realised and detailed. They have agendas and events will transpire unless PCs intervene. Clues and foreshadowing are liberally spread throughout. Players will have to give warning at least a session in advance of their intended next course if it isn’t clear and will need to cleave pretty closely to the prepared campaign area. [B]Salient detail[/B] - The level of details as found in a typical 5e/Paizo campaign/module. Areas are detailed but there are gaps. There are potential encounters and events detailed. Many NPCs and foes will be stat block only or refer to a stat block and further details are left for the DM to improvise. Same for location details. Future events are planned out assuming NPCs are free to enact them. Some of these events are foreshadowed and some clues can be found. Players can go off in unexpected directions but it will likely require a session or two foreword thinking. [B]Minimal detail -[/B] The level of certain rare sparse modules. Where little more is provided than an outline, some headlines of an encounter and a rough idea of what foes and NPCs will be found. Descriptions of locations are likely to be an overview. Most NPC/foe details will be winged on the fly. As will treasure. Players can go in most sane directions without notice and the DM will likely have a enough to fill a session. There is likely to be little forward thinking of events and relatively few clues. There may be quite a lot of procedurally generated information to fill the gaps. [B]No detail[/B] - the game is entirely dependent on what the players want to do. The world is your oyster but it will all be made up as you go. Encounter charts out of the PHB/DMG. If there are other grades I’ve missed off - spread the word. I’ve deliberated put General D&D so this doesn’t get derailed by games systems that are purely improvisational and have that as their central theme. They’re not relevant here. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
To Prep or Not to Prep - A Players Perspective
Top