Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- individual adventure modules! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed to plug in to your game.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
To Sneak Attack, or not to Sneak Attack that is the question...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ConspiracyAngel" data-source="post: 1924974" data-attributes="member: 15561"><p>A friend said this to me today:</p><p></p><p>“It’s funny… in D&D the only way you can be a truly effective social character is to either know how exactly to dagger someone, or know how to make magical music.”</p><p></p><p>And, for the most part I agree with his assessment. (Sorcerers are CHA based, but only get 2 skill pts and their only social class skill is Bluff).</p><p></p><p>As the discussion progressed, the direction took us to examine the Rogue character. To get to the point quickly, here is the problem. Rogues are the “do-most-anything” characters. But truly, there are several very different ways to be a Rogue. For example, you can be good at social interaction, or deception, or very nimble athlete, sneaking and/or stealing… frankly they have enough skill points to be good a combination of these things. </p><p></p><p>I disagree that a class as flexible as a Rogue must be stereotyped as <u>all</u> being Sneak Attack-ers. On the same note, I know many other kinds of characters (Rangers, Fighters, Monks, etc) that have dedicated themselves to the art of learning how to injure others skillfully and who might be Sneak Attack worthy… one day.</p><p></p><p>On this note, here is the opinion that I would like input on: </p><p></p><p>I think that the Sneak Attack for a Rogue should be optional. This is what I would propose: make Sneak Attack a skill. Make it (another) Rogue only class skill. Make the 1d6 accessible at 4 ranks, and each following d6 available at each even interval thereafter (6 ranks=2d6, 8 ranks=3d6). This system would allow Rogues, and Rogues ONLY to have Sneak Attack from the start… and other classes would have to build their ranks only to finally achieve their 1d6 Sneak Attack at 5th level. </p><p></p><p>This would allow Rogues to not have to endure that ever so common stereotype. To “reimburse” the Rogue, you would supply them one extra skill point (1 extra point x 4 at first level gives them enough to take Sneak Attack OR use it elsewhere as they see fit for their character). The skill plan above matches the Rogue character template for gaining Sneak Attack di. It also provides a buffer that prevents other classes from “out shining” the Rogue in this skill until much later in the game.</p><p></p><p>Is this an idea that you would consider?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ConspiracyAngel, post: 1924974, member: 15561"] A friend said this to me today: “It’s funny… in D&D the only way you can be a truly effective social character is to either know how exactly to dagger someone, or know how to make magical music.” And, for the most part I agree with his assessment. (Sorcerers are CHA based, but only get 2 skill pts and their only social class skill is Bluff). As the discussion progressed, the direction took us to examine the Rogue character. To get to the point quickly, here is the problem. Rogues are the “do-most-anything” characters. But truly, there are several very different ways to be a Rogue. For example, you can be good at social interaction, or deception, or very nimble athlete, sneaking and/or stealing… frankly they have enough skill points to be good a combination of these things. I disagree that a class as flexible as a Rogue must be stereotyped as [U]all[/U] being Sneak Attack-ers. On the same note, I know many other kinds of characters (Rangers, Fighters, Monks, etc) that have dedicated themselves to the art of learning how to injure others skillfully and who might be Sneak Attack worthy… one day. On this note, here is the opinion that I would like input on: I think that the Sneak Attack for a Rogue should be optional. This is what I would propose: make Sneak Attack a skill. Make it (another) Rogue only class skill. Make the 1d6 accessible at 4 ranks, and each following d6 available at each even interval thereafter (6 ranks=2d6, 8 ranks=3d6). This system would allow Rogues, and Rogues ONLY to have Sneak Attack from the start… and other classes would have to build their ranks only to finally achieve their 1d6 Sneak Attack at 5th level. This would allow Rogues to not have to endure that ever so common stereotype. To “reimburse” the Rogue, you would supply them one extra skill point (1 extra point x 4 at first level gives them enough to take Sneak Attack OR use it elsewhere as they see fit for their character). The skill plan above matches the Rogue character template for gaining Sneak Attack di. It also provides a buffer that prevents other classes from “out shining” the Rogue in this skill until much later in the game. Is this an idea that you would consider? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
To Sneak Attack, or not to Sneak Attack that is the question...
Top