To the old board members: Do the same threads always come up?

[EricNoah]

Oh, sure, no question especially if it's a topic that can be addressed with facts. I was thinking more in terms of debatable issues like alignment, is this-or-that broken/nerfed/shafted, etc.

 

[Henry]

...I was thinking more in terms of debatable issues like alignment, is this-or-that broken/nerfed/shafted, etc.

Y'know, I think I DID make my Will save last time I saw one of those... and if I did, it would be a first.

 

[Hypersmurf]

Oh, sure, no question especially if it's a topic that can be addressed with facts. I was thinking more in terms of debatable issues like alignment, is this-or-that broken/nerfed/shafted, etc.

I don't understand what you mean.

Alignment is a topic that can be addressed with facts. The nine alignments are clearly defined in the PHB.

What possible alignment question could come up that can't be addressed incontrovertibly with a quote from the rules?

Are you just having me on?

-Hyp.

 

[the Jester]

I don't understand what you mean.

Alignment is a topic that can be addressed with facts. The nine alignments are clearly defined in the PHB.

What possible alignment question could come up that can't be addressed incontrovertibly with a quote from the rules?

Are you just having me on?

-Hyp.

God DAMN but I love this guy!

 

[Gez]

Just look at the number of threads a minor sub-topic alone creates... For example, "Spellcasting Prodigy", or "Whirlwind Attack + Great Cleave". Of course, the 3.5 fixing/nerfing/revising/whatevering of rules may finally kill these topics (while spawning others at the same time), but even then, they enjoy a long, tormented agony.

 

[der_kluge]

My favorites are the:

Let's analyze gamers threads
and
characters of the opposite sex threads

Those seem to pop up every now and again.