Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Quickleaf" data-source="post: 4668119" data-attributes="member: 20323">Hey, I added a .pdf of my finished draftThat's a really good point, Jack, cause it depends on how a group wants to handle warfare. My approach is to focus on the PCs' actions, not the troops they lead, and to have those actions have a direct impact on the battle's outcome. Also, the table I created is more for PCs taking orders rather than acting as commanders - they might lead a unit, but they don't lead the army.So these rules wouldn't work for a group that wants to focus on troop movements and strategy or resource management. They are pretty cool for groups who want to give PCs a meaningful role in the midst of war, to act outside the confines of a unit when need be, and to throw surprises representing the ebb and flow of war. Also it's easy to represent prior planning/adventures with a modifier to the d20 encounter table roll.</blockquote>