Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
To what degree do you alter published settings?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jdrakeh" data-source="post: 3680098" data-attributes="member: 13892"><p>Incidentally, I ask because I'm trying to recapture that youthful sense of wonder in RPGs (for me). I've finally realized that part of what's missing is <em>open-ended campaign expansion</em>. Let me explain. . . </p><p></p><p>Way back when, in the days when D&D was a lone box set and Runequest was a single rulebook, settings were <em>implied</em>. The expectation of adherance to canon didn't exist because there wasn't much of it -- Bob's land of Greyhawk might be entirely different than Bill's, save for the minor details disclosed in the original Gazetteer and the three D&D core rule books. The first look at Glorantha came via Apple Valley and Snakepipe Hollow -- there was no all-encompassing body of setting material and, again, Jill's Glorantha was almost certanly nothing like the world that Greg Stafford would reveal in the years to come. Even the FR 1e material was painted in <em>extremely</em> broad strokes, with plenty of map left to fill in as one saw fit. </p><p></p><p>While it's true that today one can simply ignore the massive collections of setting canon that have since been published for worlds such as Glorantha or Faerun, the expectation seems to exist that the DM <em>won't</em>. Indeed, settings have a market presence of their own because many gamers want to have every last setting detail fed to them in print. Now, I know that sounds petty but if that desire didn't exist, neither would the market for setting product lines. Whether this desire came about as a marketing push for setting material on the part of publishers or vice-versa, I'm not entirely certain. </p><p></p><p>What I <em>am</em> certain of is that this "official continuity or none at all" mindest that seems to have become increasingly prevalent in my recent attempts to organize games is sucking much fun out of gaming for me. That players want me to buy, read, and adhere to <em>all</em> official canon for massive products lines such as FR is <em>extremely</em> off-putting. I hunger for the days of settings as backdrops for adventure, as opposed to hobbies in and of themselves. I hunger for the days of many Greyhawks and Gloranthas.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jdrakeh, post: 3680098, member: 13892"] Incidentally, I ask because I'm trying to recapture that youthful sense of wonder in RPGs (for me). I've finally realized that part of what's missing is [i]open-ended campaign expansion[/i]. Let me explain. . . Way back when, in the days when D&D was a lone box set and Runequest was a single rulebook, settings were [i]implied[/i]. The expectation of adherance to canon didn't exist because there wasn't much of it -- Bob's land of Greyhawk might be entirely different than Bill's, save for the minor details disclosed in the original Gazetteer and the three D&D core rule books. The first look at Glorantha came via Apple Valley and Snakepipe Hollow -- there was no all-encompassing body of setting material and, again, Jill's Glorantha was almost certanly nothing like the world that Greg Stafford would reveal in the years to come. Even the FR 1e material was painted in [i]extremely[/i] broad strokes, with plenty of map left to fill in as one saw fit. While it's true that today one can simply ignore the massive collections of setting canon that have since been published for worlds such as Glorantha or Faerun, the expectation seems to exist that the DM [i]won't[/i]. Indeed, settings have a market presence of their own because many gamers want to have every last setting detail fed to them in print. Now, I know that sounds petty but if that desire didn't exist, neither would the market for setting product lines. Whether this desire came about as a marketing push for setting material on the part of publishers or vice-versa, I'm not entirely certain. What I [i]am[/i] certain of is that this "official continuity or none at all" mindest that seems to have become increasingly prevalent in my recent attempts to organize games is sucking much fun out of gaming for me. That players want me to buy, read, and adhere to [i]all[/i] official canon for massive products lines such as FR is [i]extremely[/i] off-putting. I hunger for the days of settings as backdrops for adventure, as opposed to hobbies in and of themselves. I hunger for the days of many Greyhawks and Gloranthas. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
To what degree do you alter published settings?
Top