Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Toll the Chest
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hriston" data-source="post: 8689707" data-attributes="member: 6787503"><p>Really? A troll, even one just walking by, isn't likely to cause damage or danger? That's a new one to me.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Okay, so now you know the troll is a threat because it's participating in the first round of combat and you can see if anyone on the opposing side is surprised because they didn't notice the troll before combat started. Where's the problem, exactly?</p><p></p><p></p><p>No it doesn't for a couple reasons: </p><p style="margin-left: 20px">1. The definition of <em>threat </em>already contains the concept of potentiality. See the word <em>likely </em>in there?</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">2. If you include every object and creature that might possibly harbor a threat in the category of things you can notice to avoid surprise, then no one will ever be surprised because they always will have noticed something.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I didn't see anything in the OP to indicate that any of the players declared an action to try to use their senses or awareness of the environment to detect the presence of a creature. If any of the PCs weren't otherwise occupying their attention, however, I would use their passive scores to determine if they noticed the creature as they came within range. Of course the cleric is likely to have a high Wisdom which I think should be rewarded. By deciding the mimic is automatically successful in its attempt to remain motionless, you're negating that PC build choice.</p><p></p><p></p><p>It seems to me that neither the stat-block nor the lore support your claim that the ability is perfect. Perhaps you're bringing in this assumption from somewhere outside of the game?</p><p></p><p></p><p>As always and as I just said in the post to which you're responding here, it's the DM's call whether to ask for an ability check and what ability to use. The OP explicitly asked how individual DMs would adjudicate the cleric player's action declaration, which is the question I answered.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I disagree. Neither the stat-block nor the lore state the mimic's ability works perfectly every single time.</p><p></p><p></p><p>And yet I have people in this thread accusing me of being unfair to the players. I guess you can't please everybody!</p><p></p><p></p><p>A rock isn't a creature. It's an object, so it doesn't have to try to be stealthy to avoid being noticed. A creature, on the other hand, is noticed by default, even if it's unseen or invisible, even if it appears to be an ordinary object, unless it tries to be stealthy.</p><p></p><p></p><p>1. An ordinary chest is not a threat.</p><p>2. The cleric failed to notice the mimic.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hriston, post: 8689707, member: 6787503"] Really? A troll, even one just walking by, isn't likely to cause damage or danger? That's a new one to me. Okay, so now you know the troll is a threat because it's participating in the first round of combat and you can see if anyone on the opposing side is surprised because they didn't notice the troll before combat started. Where's the problem, exactly? No it doesn't for a couple reasons: [INDENT]1. The definition of [I]threat [/I]already contains the concept of potentiality. See the word [I]likely [/I]in there?[/INDENT] [INDENT]2. If you include every object and creature that might possibly harbor a threat in the category of things you can notice to avoid surprise, then no one will ever be surprised because they always will have noticed something.[/INDENT] I didn't see anything in the OP to indicate that any of the players declared an action to try to use their senses or awareness of the environment to detect the presence of a creature. If any of the PCs weren't otherwise occupying their attention, however, I would use their passive scores to determine if they noticed the creature as they came within range. Of course the cleric is likely to have a high Wisdom which I think should be rewarded. By deciding the mimic is automatically successful in its attempt to remain motionless, you're negating that PC build choice. It seems to me that neither the stat-block nor the lore support your claim that the ability is perfect. Perhaps you're bringing in this assumption from somewhere outside of the game? As always and as I just said in the post to which you're responding here, it's the DM's call whether to ask for an ability check and what ability to use. The OP explicitly asked how individual DMs would adjudicate the cleric player's action declaration, which is the question I answered. I disagree. Neither the stat-block nor the lore state the mimic's ability works perfectly every single time. And yet I have people in this thread accusing me of being unfair to the players. I guess you can't please everybody! A rock isn't a creature. It's an object, so it doesn't have to try to be stealthy to avoid being noticed. A creature, on the other hand, is noticed by default, even if it's unseen or invisible, even if it appears to be an ordinary object, unless it tries to be stealthy. 1. An ordinary chest is not a threat. 2. The cleric failed to notice the mimic. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Toll the Chest
Top