Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Tom Swift on CW
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Willie the Duck" data-source="post: 8664640" data-attributes="member: 6799660"><p>Because they want the name recognition, know most of the audience probably hasn't read most of the material, and most aren't attached to any given specific component of the original material. What basic principles do you think were violated (as opposed to just changing things)?</p><p></p><p>The age change might have something to do with our current view towards teenagers wandering around dangerous situations unsupervised. As for a hyper-rational deductive investigator, it depends. Agent Scully worked very well on X-files (for 3-4 seasons, until it because nonsensical that she didn't believe in the supernatural when she saw it every other Friday). </p><p></p><p>For Tom Swift, I think sticking to the source material would have been a problem because <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonny_Quest" target="_blank">several </a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richie_Rich_(comics)" target="_blank">copycats</a> have already been popularized over the years which follow that formula. Moving up the age makes it a little different deal. As does black (also perhaps heads off any articles which look up the series and notice <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Swift#Racism" target="_blank"><em>Tom Swift and his Electric Rifle</em></a>). As does gay I guess (and agree with Practicalm, tv execs are a lot more ready to have a gay romance onscreen if it is secondary characters and especially if it means they can show two women kissing). </p><p></p><p>I don't watch a lot of CW young adult fare. Too much of it that I have seen has been of the 'hey young adult, you should feel bad if your life isn't showing off 6 pack abs while getting out of your Maserati's pulled up to a trendy nightclub' variety. That said, I don't really think a Nancy Drew or Tom Swift, as initially written, really could make it as a TV show. Heck, mainstays like <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sherlock_Holmes_(2009_film)" target="_blank">Sherlock Holmes</a> and <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_on_the_Nile_(2022_film)" target="_blank">Hercule Poirot</a> have a hard time making a go of it without serious star power or a hook or change or something. Stuff like this might be the only way to keep these properties relevant.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Willie the Duck, post: 8664640, member: 6799660"] Because they want the name recognition, know most of the audience probably hasn't read most of the material, and most aren't attached to any given specific component of the original material. What basic principles do you think were violated (as opposed to just changing things)? The age change might have something to do with our current view towards teenagers wandering around dangerous situations unsupervised. As for a hyper-rational deductive investigator, it depends. Agent Scully worked very well on X-files (for 3-4 seasons, until it because nonsensical that she didn't believe in the supernatural when she saw it every other Friday). For Tom Swift, I think sticking to the source material would have been a problem because [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonny_Quest']several [/URL][URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richie_Rich_(comics)']copycats[/URL] have already been popularized over the years which follow that formula. Moving up the age makes it a little different deal. As does black (also perhaps heads off any articles which look up the series and notice [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Swift#Racism'][I]Tom Swift and his Electric Rifle[/I][/URL]). As does gay I guess (and agree with Practicalm, tv execs are a lot more ready to have a gay romance onscreen if it is secondary characters and especially if it means they can show two women kissing). I don't watch a lot of CW young adult fare. Too much of it that I have seen has been of the 'hey young adult, you should feel bad if your life isn't showing off 6 pack abs while getting out of your Maserati's pulled up to a trendy nightclub' variety. That said, I don't really think a Nancy Drew or Tom Swift, as initially written, really could make it as a TV show. Heck, mainstays like [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sherlock_Holmes_(2009_film)']Sherlock Holmes[/URL] and [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_on_the_Nile_(2022_film)']Hercule Poirot[/URL] have a hard time making a go of it without serious star power or a hook or change or something. Stuff like this might be the only way to keep these properties relevant. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Tom Swift on CW
Top