Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Tomb of Annihilation Is Here - What Do You Think?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mercule" data-source="post: 7723712" data-attributes="member: 5100"><p>I'm cognizant of these concerns, but not really sympathetic. One of the design goals of D&D should be to promote diversity of settings. That doesn't mean we have to go back to the 2E money pit of a bazillion published settings. It does mean that, assuming WotC does have a goal of "a single unified experience", they have goals directly at odds with what I see as something that's inherent in the core of D&D.</p><p></p><p>I also don't think it's nearly as hard as you make it out. The Greyhawk gods are already in the back of the PHB. The original ToEE and AtG didn't need a deep dive into Greyhawk -- they had the maps they needed. All the pre-SCAG adventures worked just fine in the Realms w/o having a separate source book for the setting. I don't actually have SCAG, but my understanding is that many of the options aren't actually Realms-specific and that those that are (Purple Dragon Knight) actually have conversion options for other settings.</p><p></p><p>Of course, I'm also very strongly of the opinion that each published setting should have a few things that actually are unique to it and distinguish it from the other settings: Warforged and Dragonmarks for Eberron, Muls and Defilers for Dark Sun, etc. Other than a couple of sub-classes, Greyhawk and the Realms are probably the exception. So, implicitly invalidating a very small amount of the SCAG is more a feature than a bug, IMO.</p><p></p><p>I'm not an AL participant, so I'll totally grant that I don't understand the implications of switching worlds. I also don't have any idea of how much business the AL drives to WotC. Again, I'm not overly sympathetic. If AL is that big of a money machine that it warrants the lion's share of the attention, so be it. Just start putting an "AL" logo on all the Realms stuff so that it's clear that's a subset of D&D. And, then, produce some non-AL content for the rest of us. Also, stop borrowing names from the Realms for books that aren't for the Realms -- especially stupid ones like "Xanathar". At the least, borrow names from multiple settings, if the direction is to use proper names for the books.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Planescape is actually the one setting that <u>could</u> work as the default backdrop for the game. I've never particularly cared for a lot of the Planescape-isms, but they've worked their way into the game and it's supposed to be what unifies everything. If you want your AL group to follow the various published adventures, then just be aware they're passing through Sigil on their way between seasons. It also helps to permit the Purple Dragon Knight and the House Cannith Artificer in the same group (even though Eberron doesn't work particularly well with the Great Wheel).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mercule, post: 7723712, member: 5100"] I'm cognizant of these concerns, but not really sympathetic. One of the design goals of D&D should be to promote diversity of settings. That doesn't mean we have to go back to the 2E money pit of a bazillion published settings. It does mean that, assuming WotC does have a goal of "a single unified experience", they have goals directly at odds with what I see as something that's inherent in the core of D&D. I also don't think it's nearly as hard as you make it out. The Greyhawk gods are already in the back of the PHB. The original ToEE and AtG didn't need a deep dive into Greyhawk -- they had the maps they needed. All the pre-SCAG adventures worked just fine in the Realms w/o having a separate source book for the setting. I don't actually have SCAG, but my understanding is that many of the options aren't actually Realms-specific and that those that are (Purple Dragon Knight) actually have conversion options for other settings. Of course, I'm also very strongly of the opinion that each published setting should have a few things that actually are unique to it and distinguish it from the other settings: Warforged and Dragonmarks for Eberron, Muls and Defilers for Dark Sun, etc. Other than a couple of sub-classes, Greyhawk and the Realms are probably the exception. So, implicitly invalidating a very small amount of the SCAG is more a feature than a bug, IMO. I'm not an AL participant, so I'll totally grant that I don't understand the implications of switching worlds. I also don't have any idea of how much business the AL drives to WotC. Again, I'm not overly sympathetic. If AL is that big of a money machine that it warrants the lion's share of the attention, so be it. Just start putting an "AL" logo on all the Realms stuff so that it's clear that's a subset of D&D. And, then, produce some non-AL content for the rest of us. Also, stop borrowing names from the Realms for books that aren't for the Realms -- especially stupid ones like "Xanathar". At the least, borrow names from multiple settings, if the direction is to use proper names for the books. Planescape is actually the one setting that [U]could[/U] work as the default backdrop for the game. I've never particularly cared for a lot of the Planescape-isms, but they've worked their way into the game and it's supposed to be what unifies everything. If you want your AL group to follow the various published adventures, then just be aware they're passing through Sigil on their way between seasons. It also helps to permit the Purple Dragon Knight and the House Cannith Artificer in the same group (even though Eberron doesn't work particularly well with the Great Wheel). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Tomb of Annihilation Is Here - What Do You Think?
Top