Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Tomb of Annihilation - Moral Question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JacktheRabbit" data-source="post: 7353202" data-attributes="member: 525"><p>Reading through the Tomb of Annihilation and several thoughts occurred to me beyond general thoughts about the overall design of the module.</p><p></p><p>1. Rich getting richer - Overall this module is about savings the 1% and helping them stay the 1%. Even in a magic heavy world like the Forgotten Realms it is really only 1% of the top 1% that benefit from resurrection magic. So the party is not doing anything noble or brave. They are helping Elon Musk and Bill Gates get even richer.</p><p></p><p>2. Wrong Goal - At some point the party should figure out that the Soulmonger is also depriving Lich's of the souls they need to feed their jars which is necessary to stay "unalive". Now other than a very small number of previous edition Elf Lich the Lich is a universally evil and dangerous "race" of beings. Their complete destruction would absolutely be a positive to the Realms as a whole.</p><p></p><p>Now the souls are being used to create a new evil god. Not that big a deal really , the Realms are dirty with gods both big and small. One more god created by the Soulmonger is not going to shift the balance of power in the Outer Planes. </p><p></p><p>So what happens if a party decides to heck with stopping the Soulmonger but instead decide to protect it and keep it running until every Lich in the Realm drops dead permanently. Sure it means a certain number of resurrected people will die, but the destruction of every Lich from Sass on down is a far greater triumph and well worth the death of people who should already be dead.</p><p></p><p>Opinions? The module is of course written with the thought that of course the device must be destroyed. The conclusion gives no other options and even confirms how the party did not really do anything heroic that saved the world as the rewards gained are rich elites granting them gifts and laurels for saving them from the death they had already avoided at least once.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JacktheRabbit, post: 7353202, member: 525"] Reading through the Tomb of Annihilation and several thoughts occurred to me beyond general thoughts about the overall design of the module. 1. Rich getting richer - Overall this module is about savings the 1% and helping them stay the 1%. Even in a magic heavy world like the Forgotten Realms it is really only 1% of the top 1% that benefit from resurrection magic. So the party is not doing anything noble or brave. They are helping Elon Musk and Bill Gates get even richer. 2. Wrong Goal - At some point the party should figure out that the Soulmonger is also depriving Lich's of the souls they need to feed their jars which is necessary to stay "unalive". Now other than a very small number of previous edition Elf Lich the Lich is a universally evil and dangerous "race" of beings. Their complete destruction would absolutely be a positive to the Realms as a whole. Now the souls are being used to create a new evil god. Not that big a deal really , the Realms are dirty with gods both big and small. One more god created by the Soulmonger is not going to shift the balance of power in the Outer Planes. So what happens if a party decides to heck with stopping the Soulmonger but instead decide to protect it and keep it running until every Lich in the Realm drops dead permanently. Sure it means a certain number of resurrected people will die, but the destruction of every Lich from Sass on down is a far greater triumph and well worth the death of people who should already be dead. Opinions? The module is of course written with the thought that of course the device must be destroyed. The conclusion gives no other options and even confirms how the party did not really do anything heroic that saved the world as the rewards gained are rich elites granting them gifts and laurels for saving them from the death they had already avoided at least once. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Tomb of Annihilation - Moral Question
Top