Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="(Psi)SeveredHead" data-source="post: 3254055" data-attributes="member: 1165">Nope. Not that I noticed. My character would have cheerfully taken an Int 10 and Cha 8. I only took a higher Cha (12) because of my character concept (using White Raven, which did not require Charisma, and except for one feat didn't even require Diplomacy).I complained before about the short skill list. I don't think a high Int is that useful when it comes to skills. A lower Int would actually make designing the character easier - I don't want to be "forced" to take ranks in Balance (no matter how useful it might be) when it doesn't fit my character concept.I didn't take IHS. I did take the counter that lets me use Concentration for Will saves. That thing is amazing! It didn't bother me that I had to give up 25% of my maneuvers because it's so useful!It's like a wizard complaining that they have to give up an 8th-level spell slot to cast Moment of Prescience. If you accept it as balanced, then take it. If you think it's weak, don't take it.I think the Concentration as Will save counter is balanced, not overpowered or broken (unlike certain other maneuvers or parts-of-the-package). You can only use it once per round, and probably aren't going to use it more than once per combat (unless the combat takes a long time and you recharge, and the recharge scheme is kind of overpowered, IMO).It didn't seem like that to me. Maybe I just think not failing Will saves to be worth it. I know I didn't want to be blinded (by Glitterdust), or frightened, or shaken, or a zillion other conditions on the battlefield.I didn't even glance at that class, actually.I wonder if that was the thing I thought might be broken? The one with RAI vs RAW - is that the one where you might get an extra action, depending on your exact initiative? Or is that the Diplomacy DC 20 feat?</blockquote>

Verification